Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25454630›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2015

The relationship between unhealthy snacking at school and academic outcomes: a population study in Chilean schoolchildren.

Paulina Correa-Burrows, Raquel Burrows, Yasna Orellana, Daniza Ivanovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Consumption of Sweets and Academic Performance among Mongolian Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nutritional quality of diet and academic performance in Chilean students.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paulina Correa-BurrowsInstitute of Nutrition and Food Technology,University of Chile,Avda. El Líbano 5524,Macul,CP 7830490,Santiago de Chile,Chile.
Raquel BurrowsInstitute of Nutrition and Food Technology,University of Chile,Avda. El Líbano 5524,Macul,CP 7830490,Santiago de Chile,Chile.
Yasna OrellanaInstitute of Nutrition and Food Technology,University of Chile,Avda. El Líbano 5524,Macul,CP 7830490,Santiago de Chile,Chile.
Daniza IvanovicInstitute of Nutrition and Food Technology,University of Chile,Avda. El Líbano 5524,Macul,CP 7830490,Santiago de Chile,Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe examined the association between unhealthy snacking at school and academic outcomes in students from the Santiago Metropolitan Region (Chile).

designCross-sectional population-based study.

settingWe measured the nutritional quality of snacks at school using an FFQ, and accounting for the amounts of saturated fat, fibre, sugar and salt in the foods, and academic outcomes using national standardized test scores in Language and Mathematics. Multivariate regression analyses modelled the relationship between unhealthy snacking at school (exposure), potential confounders and performance in Mathematics and Language (outcomes). SUBJECTS: Random sample of 1073 students (13.1 (SD 2.3) years old) attending public, partially subsidized and private schools.

resultsFifty-six per cent of students ate items at snack time that were high in fat, sugar, salt and energy, and thus were considered to have unhealthy snaking. Thirty-six per cent and 8% were considered to have poor-to-fair and healthy snacking, respectively. Unhealthy snacking significantly lowered the odds of good academic performance in both domains. Students having unhealthy snacks were 56% less likely to pass in Language (fully adjusted OR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.23, 0.85) and 66% less likely to pass in Mathematics (fully adjusted OR = 0.34; 95% CI 0.19, 0.64) compared with students having healthy snack items.

conclusionsSchoolchildren eating unhealthy foods at snack time had worse academic performance in Language and Mathematics, as measured by a standardized test. Although association does not imply causation, these findings support the notion that academic and health-related behaviours are linked. More research is needed on the effect of school health programmes on educational outcomes.

Indexed as

AchievementDietEducational MeasurementNutritive ValueSchoolsSnacksAdolescentChildChileCross-Sectional StudiesEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleOdds RatioAcademic performanceEating habitsSchool-age childrenWestern diet

Identifiers

PMID25454630
PMCPMC10271780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.