Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25453745›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2015

The impact of fornix lesions in rats on spatial learning tasks sensitive to anterior thalamic and hippocampal damage.

Julie R Dumont, Eman Amin, Nicholas F Wright, Christopher M Dillingham, John P Aggleton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multimodal MEG and Microstructure-MRI Investigations of the Human Hippocampal Scene Network.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The role of the fornix in human navigational learning.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. White Matter Dissection of the Fetal Brain.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie R DumontSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, 70 Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales, UK. Electronic address: Julie.Dumont@dartmouth.edu.
Eman AminSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, 70 Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales, UK.
Nicholas F WrightSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, 70 Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales, UK.
Christopher M DillinghamSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, 70 Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales, UK.
John P AggletonSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, 70 Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, Wales, UK.
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT087855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study sought to understand how the hippocampus and anterior thalamic nuclei are conjointly required for spatial learning by examining the impact of cutting a major tract (the fornix) that interconnects these two sites. The initial experiments examined the consequences of fornix lesions in rats on spatial biconditional discrimination learning. The rationale arose from previous findings showing that fornix lesions spare the learning of spatial biconditional tasks, despite the same task being highly sensitive to both hippocampal and anterior thalamic nuclei lesions. In the present study, fornix lesions only delayed acquisition of the spatial biconditional task, pointing to additional contributions from non-fornical routes linking the hippocampus with the anterior thalamic nuclei. The same fornix lesions spared the learning of an analogous nonspatial biconditional task that used local contextual cues. Subsequent tests, including T-maze place alternation, place learning in a cross-maze, and a go/no-go place discrimination, highlighted the impact of fornix lesions when distal spatial information is used flexibly to guide behaviour. The final experiment examined the ability to learn incidentally the spatial features of a square water-maze that had differently patterned walls. Fornix lesions disrupted performance but did not stop the rats from distinguishing the various corners of the maze. Overall, the results indicate that interconnections between the hippocampus and anterior thalamus, via the fornix, help to resolve problems with flexible spatial and temporal cues, but the results also signal the importance of additional, non-fornical contributions to hippocampal-anterior thalamic spatial processing, particularly for problems with more stable spatial solutions.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsBrain InjuriesCatheter AblationCuesDecision MakingDiscrimination LearningDisease Models, AnimalFornix, BrainHippocampusLearning DisabilitiesMaleMaze LearningNeural PathwaysRatsSpatial LearningBiconditional learningCognitive mapConfigural learningHippocampusIncidental learningThalamus

Identifiers

PMID25453745
PMCPMC4274319
OpenAlexW2150604139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.