Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25453345›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2014

Risk factors differ between recurrent and incident preeclampsia: a hospital-based cohort study.

Nansi S Boghossian, Edwina Yeung, Pauline Mendola, Stefanie N Hinkle, S Katherine Laughon, Cuilin Zhang, Paul S Albert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nansi S Boghossian
Edwina Yeung
Pauline Mendola
Stefanie N Hinkle
S Katherine Laughon
Cuilin Zhang
Paul S Albert

Funding

NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800002CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275200800002I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine whether risk factors, including prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), differ between recurrent and incident preeclampsia.

methodsData included electronic medical records of nulliparas (n = 26,613) delivering 2 times or more in Utah (2002-2010). Modified Poisson regression models were used to examine (1) adjusted relative risks (RR) of preeclampsia and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with prepregnancy BMI; (2) maternal risk factor differences between incident and recurrent preeclampsia among primiparous women.

resultsIn the first pregnancy, compared with normal weight women (BMI: 18.5-24.9), preeclampsia risks for overweight (BMI: 25-29.9), obese class I (BMI: 30-34.9), and obese class II/III (BMI: ≥ 35) women were 1.82 (95% CI = 1.60-2.06), 2.10 (95% CI = 1.76-2.50), and 2.84 (95% CI = 2.32-3.47), respectively, whereas second pregnancy-incident preeclampsia risks were 1.66 (95% CI = 1.27-2.16), 2.31 (95% CI = 1.67-3.20), and 4.29 (95% CI = 3.16-5.82), respectively. Recurrent preeclampsia risks associated with BMI were highest among obese class I women (RR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.06-2.42) without increasing in a dose-response manner. Nonwhite women had higher recurrence risk than white women (RR = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.16-2.50), whereas second pregnancy-incident preeclampsia risk did not differ by race.

conclusionPrepregnancy BMI appeared to have stronger associations with risk of incident preeclampsia either in the first or second pregnancy, than with recurrence risk. Nonwhite women had higher recurrence risk.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexGravidityAdultCohort StudiesEthnicityFemaleHumansIncidenceObesityOverweightParityPre-EclampsiaPregnancyRecurrenceRiskRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID25453345
PMCPMC4355246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.