Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25453266›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2015

Clinical implications of miRNAs in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer.

Satyanarayana Rachagani, Muzafar A Macha, Nicholas Heimann, Parthasarathy Seshacharyulu, Dhanya Haridas, Seema Chugh, Surinder K Batra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Satyanarayana RachaganiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 69198, USA. Electronic address: srachagani@unmc.edu.
Muzafar A MachaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 69198, USA.
Nicholas HeimannDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 69198, USA.
Parthasarathy SeshacharyuluDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 69198, USA.
Dhanya HaridasDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 69198, USA.
Seema ChughDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 69198, USA.
Surinder K BatraDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 69198, USA; Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 69198, USA. Electronic address: sbatra@unmc.edu.

Funding

Tissue CoreP50CA127297 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HOLLINGSWORTH, MICHAEL A. · 2008 to 2018
$17.1M
Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic CancerU01CA111294 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K., HOLLINGSWORTH, MICHAEL A. · 2004 to 2015
$7.1M
Role of N-Cadherin in Pancreatic Tumor MicroenvironmentU54CA163120 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K. · 2011 to 2015
$4.2M
Targeting Mucin and EGFR Axis in Pancreatic CancerR01CA183459 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K. · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Targeting MUC4 for chemosensitization of pancreatic cancerR03CA167342 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K. · 2012 to 2013
$143k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127297NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183459NCI NIH HHS R03 CA167342NCI NIH HHS U01 CA111294NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163120NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA111294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite considerable progress being made in understanding pancreatic cancer (PC) pathogenesis, it still remains the 10th most often diagnosed malignancy in the world and 4th leading cause of cancer related deaths in the United States with a five year survival rate of only 6%. The aggressive nature, lack of early diagnostic and prognostic markers, late clinical presentation, and limited efficacy of existing treatment regimens make PC a lethal cancer with high mortality and poor prognosis. Therefore, novel reliable biomarkers and molecular targets are urgently needed to combat this deadly disease. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short (19-24 nucleotides) non-coding RNA molecules implicated in the regulation of gene expression at post-transcriptional level and play significant roles in various physiological and pathological conditions. Aberrant expression of miRNAs has been reported in several cancers including PC and is implicated in PC pathogenesis and progression, suggesting their utility in diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. In this review, we summarize the role of several miRNAs that regulate various oncogenes (KRAS) and tumor suppressor genes (p53, p16, SMAD4, etc.) involved in PC development, their prospective roles as diagnostic and prognostic markers and as a therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMicroRNAsMolecular Targeted TherapyPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsDiagnosismiRNAPancreatic cancerPathogenesisTherapy

Identifiers

PMID25453266
PMCPMC4465296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.