ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2015
An integrated microfluidic device for screening the effective concentration of locally applied tacrolimus for peripheral nerve regeneration.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in ex vivo models and lab-on-a-chip devices for neural tissue engineering.Biomaterials · 2019Review
- Microphysiological Human Brain and Neural Systems-on-a-Chip: Potential Alternatives to Small Animal Models and Emerging Platforms for Drug Discovery and Personalized Medicine.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2017Review
- Kinsenoside screening with a microfluidic chip attenuates gouty arthritis through inactivating NF-κB signaling in macrophages and protecting endothelial cells.Cell death & disease · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effectiveness of tacrolimus (FK506) for the promotion of nerve regeneration is known. However, at present, due to the fact that systemic application may lead to opportunistic infections and tumors, and that the treatment of peripheral nerve injury with systemic immunosuppression is not generally accepted, FK506 has not been widely used for the treatment of simple or peripheral nerve injury. In this study, a pyramid-shaped microfluidic device was designed and fabricated that was able to analyze the effective concentration of locally applied FK506. After testing the effectiveness of the microfluidic device by measuring the fluorescence intensity of fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran, rat Schwann cells (SCs) were loaded into the device and cultured for 9 days in the presence of different concentrations of FK506. SC proliferation in the presence of FK506 was concentration-dependent between 0 and 2.5±0.003 ng/ml. The proliferation rate reached a maximum at 1.786±0.014 ng/ml, which was statistically significantly different from the proliferation rate at lower FK506 concentrations. There was no statistically significant difference in the proliferation rate between the 1.786 ng/ml group and groups of higher FK506 concentrations. Furthermore, the SCs in the microfluidic device and a 96-well plate continued to proliferate as the culture time increased. No statistically significant differences were identified between the microfluidic device and a 96-well plate with regard to the proliferation rates in each corresponding group. The results obtained in this study demonstrated that the microfluidic device can be used as an excellent platform for the study of drug concentration at the cellular level, and the effective FK506 concentration for local application is 1.786±0.014 ng/ml.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.