ArticleFrontiers in psychology2014
Temporal factors affecting somatosensory-auditory interactions in speech processing.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beta rhythm modulation by speech sounds: somatotopic mapping in somatosensory cortex.Scientific reports · 2016Trial
- Auditory-Somatosensory Interactions in Speech Perception in Individuals With Hearing Impairment: An Exploratory Case Study.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Somatosensory influence on auditory cortical response of self-generated sound.Neuropsychologia · 2025Article
- Repetitive Exposure to Orofacial Somatosensory Inputs in Speech Perceptual Training Modulates Vowel Categorization in Speech Perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- An experimental device for multi-directional somatosensory perturbation and its evaluation in a pilot psychophysical experiment.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- A 36-Class Bimodal ERP Brain-Computer Interface Using Location-Congruent Auditory-Tactile Stimuli.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Electrophysiological Dynamics of Visual-Tactile Temporal Order Perception in Early Deaf Adults.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Auditory and Somatosensory Interaction in Speech Perception in Children and Adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Touching lips and hearing fingers: effector-specific congruency between tactile and auditory stimulation modulates N1 amplitude and alpha desynchronization.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
- Auditory-Motor Rhythms and Speech Processing in French and German Listeners.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Speech motor learning changes the neural response to both auditory and somatosensory signals.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2015Article
- Multisensory and sensorimotor interactions in speech perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Speech perception is known to rely on both auditory and visual information. However, sound-specific somatosensory input has been shown also to influence speech perceptual processing (Ito et al., 2009). In the present study, we addressed further the relationship between somatosensory information and speech perceptual processing by addressing the hypothesis that the temporal relationship between orofacial movement and sound processing contributes to somatosensory-auditory interaction in speech perception. We examined the changes in event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to multisensory synchronous (simultaneous) and asynchronous (90 ms lag and lead) somatosensory and auditory stimulation compared to individual unisensory auditory and somatosensory stimulation alone. We used a robotic device to apply facial skin somatosensory deformations that were similar in timing and duration to those experienced in speech production. Following synchronous multisensory stimulation the amplitude of the ERP was reliably different from the two unisensory potentials. More importantly, the magnitude of the ERP difference varied as a function of the relative timing of the somatosensory-auditory stimulation. Event-related activity change due to stimulus timing was seen between 160 and 220 ms following somatosensory onset, mostly around the parietal area. The results demonstrate a dynamic modulation of somatosensory-auditory convergence and suggest the contribution of somatosensory information for speech processing process is dependent on the specific temporal order of sensory inputs in speech production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.