Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25452709›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2014

Choroid plexus in developmental and evolutionary perspective.

Brent Roy Bill, Vladimir Korzh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Single-Cell-Resolution Fate Mapping Reveals Embryonic Venous Origins of Fenestrated Hindbrain Choroid Plexus Vasculature.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cerebrovascular development: mechanisms and experimental approaches.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Choroid Plexus: The Orchestrator of Long-Range Signalling Within the CNS.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Development of brain ventricular system.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brent Roy BillSemel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Vladimir KorzhAgency for Science, Technology and Research of Singapore, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology Singapore, Singapore ; National University of Singapore, Department of Biological Sciences Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-cerebrospinal fluid boundary is present at the level of epithelial cells of the choroid plexus. As one of the sources of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), the choroid plexus (CP) plays an important role during brain development and function. Its formation has been studied largely in mammalian species. Lately, progress in other model animals, in particular the zebrafish, has brought a deeper understanding of CP formation, due in part to the ability to observe CP development in vivo. At the same time, advances in comparative genomics began providing information, which opens a possibility to understand further the molecular mechanisms involved in evolution of the CP and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid boundary formation. Hence this review focuses on analysis of the CP from developmental and evolutionary perspectives.

Indexed as

brain-CSFepitheliumgliastromatransgenicsvasculature

Identifiers

PMID25452709
PMCPMC4231874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.