Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25452575›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2015

Causal Influence of Articulatory Motor Cortex on Comprehending Single Spoken Words: TMS Evidence.

Malte R Schomers, Evgeniya Kirilina, Anne Weigand, Malek Bajbouj, Friedemann Pulvermüller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phonological Representations of Auditory and Visual Speech in the Occipito-temporal Cortex and Beyond.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of Bilateral Opercular Syndrome on Speech Perception.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021
    Article
  12. Multimodal comprehension in left hemisphere stroke patients.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Facilitation of motor excitability during listening to spoken sentences is not modulated by noise or semantic coherence.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Semantic word category processing in semantic dementia and posterior cortical atrophy.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Malte R SchomersBrain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany.
Evgeniya KirilinaDahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Anne WeigandDahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany Department of Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 14050 Berlin, Germany Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Malek BajboujDahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany Department of Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 14050 Berlin, Germany.
Friedemann PulvermüllerBrain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105580445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classic wisdom had been that motor and premotor cortex contribute to motor execution but not to higher cognition and language comprehension. In contrast, mounting evidence from neuroimaging, patient research, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggest sensorimotor interaction and, specifically, that the articulatory motor cortex is important for classifying meaningless speech sounds into phonemic categories. However, whether these findings speak to the comprehension issue is unclear, because language comprehension does not require explicit phonemic classification and previous results may therefore relate to factors alien to semantic understanding. We here used the standard psycholinguistic test of spoken word comprehension, the word-to-picture-matching task, and concordant TMS to articulatory motor cortex. TMS pulses were applied to primary motor cortex controlling either the lips or the tongue as subjects heard critical word stimuli starting with bilabial lip-related or alveolar tongue-related stop consonants (e.g., "pool" or "tool"). A significant cross-over interaction showed that articulatory motor cortex stimulation delayed comprehension responses for phonologically incongruent words relative to congruous ones (i.e., lip area TMS delayed "tool" relative to "pool" responses). As local TMS to articulatory motor areas differentially delays the comprehension of phonologically incongruous spoken words, we conclude that motor systems can take a causal role in semantic comprehension and, hence, higher cognition.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultComprehensionFemaleHumansLipMaleMotor CortexSpeech PerceptionTongueTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultaction-perception theorylanguage comprehensionmotor systemspeech processingtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID25452575
PMCPMC4585521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.