Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25452540›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2014

Relationship continuity: when and why do primary care patients think it is safer?

Penny Rhodes, Caroline Sanders, Stephen Campbell

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Healthcare of patients with atopic dermatitis by general practitioners - a nationwide survey in Germany.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Towards understanding and improving medication safety for patients with mental illness in primary care: A multimethod study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. What mechanisms could link GP relational continuity to patient outcomes?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  17. Developing a patient safety guide for primary care: A co-design approach involving patients, carers and clinicians.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Relational continuity and patients' perception of GP trust and respect: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Penny RhodesCentre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester.
Caroline SandersCentre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester.
Stephen CampbellCentre for Primary Care and NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDoctor-patient continuity is popular with patients and practitioners, and is associated with better outcomes; however, changes in policy and practice organisation have diminished its scope. Although there has been some discussion of safety implications from professionals' perspective, patients' views remain largely unexplored.

aimTo explore patients' understanding of safety in primary care. DESIGN AND

settingAn interview-based study with patients from general practices in the northwest of England.

methodPatients were recruited from five general practices through patient participation groups and posters in waiting rooms, with further participants recruited through snowballing techniques until no new themes emerged. In-depth interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Anonymised transcripts were coded and analysed inductively. Emergent themes were discussed by the team.

resultsFor patients, relationship continuity was not simply a matter of service quality but an important safety concern that offered greater psychosocial security than consultations with unfamiliar GPs. Relationship continuity enabled the GP to become a repository of information; acquire specialist knowledge of a patient's condition; become familiar with the patient's consulting behaviour; provide holistic care; and foster the development of trust. Patients were also aware of the risks: a false sense of security and lack of a fresh perspective. Their desire for continuity varied with the nature of their concerns, psychological vulnerability, and perception of GPs' qualities and skills. No one supported a return to imposed continuity.

conclusionRelationship continuity and choice of GP were important safety strategies, neither of which is adequately supported by recent policy changes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareContinuity of Patient CareFamily PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdomgeneral practicepatient safetypatients’ perceptionsprimary caresystemstrust

Identifiers

PMID25452540
PMCPMC4240148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.