Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25452537›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2014

Research into practice: understanding ethnic differences in healthcare usage and outcomes in general practice.

Sally Hull, Rohini Mathur, Kambiz Boomla, Tahseen A Chowdhury, Gavin Dreyer, William Alazawi, John Robson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Progress in using the electronic health record to improve primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sally HullClinical Effectiveness Group, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London.
Rohini MathurClinical Effectiveness Group, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London.
Kambiz BoomlaClinical Effectiveness Group, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London.
Tahseen A ChowdhuryDiabetes Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London.
Gavin DreyerRenal Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London.
William AlazawiLiver Unit, Barts Health NHS Trust, London.
John RobsonClinical Effectiveness Group, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Cultural CharacteristicsEthnicityCommunicationDelivery of Health CareGeneral PracticeHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services ResearchHumansPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID25452537
PMCPMC4240145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.