Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25451989›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2015

Using a single item to measure burnout in primary care staff: a psychometric evaluation.

Emily D Dolan, David Mohr, Michele Lempa, Sandra Joos, Stephan D Fihn, Karin M Nelson, Christian D Helfrich

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 309 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
309citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04356274 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Participatory System Dynamics vs Audit and Feedback: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Mechanisms of Implementation Change to Expand Reach of Evidence-based Addiction and Mental Health Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorPalo Alto Veterans Institute for ResearchRan2019 to 2027Enrolled720ConditionsPTSD, Depression, Alcohol Use Disorder, Opioid Use DisorderArmsParticipatory System Dynamics (PSD), Audit and Feedback (AF)
NCT06239688 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating a National Person-Centered Training Program to Strengthen the Dementia Care Workforce

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2024 to 2027Enrolled1,764ConditionsAging, Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Long-Term Care, DementiaArmsessentiALZ, Project ECHO
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

309 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. COVID-19 pandemic effects on health worker's mental health: Systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

249 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily D DolanVA Puget Sound Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Seattle, WA, USA.
David Mohr
Michele Lempa
Sandra Joos
Stephan D Fihn
Karin M Nelson
Christian D Helfrich

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBurnout affects nearly half of all U.S. nurses and physicians, and has been linked to poor outcomes such as worse patient safety. The most common measure of burnout is the well-validated Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). However, the MBI is proprietary and carries licensing fees, posing challenges to routine or repeated assessment.

objectiveTo compare a non-proprietary, single-item burnout measure to a single item from the MBI Emotional Exhaustion (MBI:EE) subscale that has been validated as a standalone burnout measure.

designCross-sectional online survey.

participantsA sample of primary care providers (PCPs), registered nurses, clinical associates (e.g., licensed practical nurses (LPNs), medical technicians), and administrative clerks in the Veterans Health Administration surveyed in 2012. MAIN

methodsWe compared a validated one-item version of the MBI:EE and a non-proprietary single-item burnout measure used in the Physician Work Life Study. We calculated kappa statistics, sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and area under the receiver operator curve (AUC). We conducted analyses stratified by occupation to determine the stability of the correlation between the two measures. KEY

resultsWe analyzed responses from 5,404 participants, including 1,769 providers and 1,380 registered nurses. The prevalence of burnout was 36.7% as measured on the single MBI:EE item and 38.5% as measured on the non-proprietary single-item measure. Relative to the MBI:EE, the non-proprietary single-item measure had a correlation of 0.79, sensitivity of 83.2%, specificity of 87.4%, and AUC of 0.93 (se = 0.004). Results were similar when stratified by respondent occupation.

conclusionsA non-proprietary single-item measure served as a reliable substitute for the MBI:EE across occupations. Because it is non-proprietary and easy to interpret, it has logistical advantages over the one-item MBI.

Indexed as

AdultArea Under CurveBurnout, ProfessionalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, VeteransHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamPhysicians, Primary CarePrevalencePrimary Health CarePsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID25451989
PMCPMC4395610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.