Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25451936›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2015

Conformational selection and equilibrium governs the ability of retinals to bind opsin.

Christopher T Schafer, David L Farrens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A rapid, tag-free way to purify functional GPCRs.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ligand channel in pharmacologically stabilized rhodopsin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Decay of an active GPCR: Conformational dynamics govern agonist rebinding and persistence of an active, yet empty, receptor state.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Structural dynamics and energetics underlying allosteric inactivation of the cannabinoid receptor CB1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher T SchaferFrom the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239-3098.
David L FarrensFrom the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239-3098 farrensd@ohsu.edu.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Program in Molecular and Cellular BiosciencesT32GM071338 · NIGMS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MASLEN, CHERYL L · 2005 to 2020
$3.5M
Structural Dynamics of Retinal Binding and ReleaseR01EY015436 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FARRENS, DAVID L · 2006 to 2014
$2.6M
Translational Vision Science Research at Oregon Health & Science UniversityT32EY023211 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Yali Jia, Kate E Keller · 2013 to 2026
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015436NEI NIH HHS T32 EY023211NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM071338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive study, how retinal enters and exits the visual G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin remains unclear. One clue may lie in two openings between transmembrane helix 1 (TM1) and TM7 and between TM5 and TM6 in the active receptor structure. Recently, retinal has been proposed to enter the inactive apoprotein opsin (ops) through these holes when the receptor transiently adopts the active opsin conformation (ops*). Here, we directly test this "transient activation" hypothesis using a fluorescence-based approach to measure rates of retinal binding to samples containing differing relative fractions of ops and ops*. In contrast to what the transient activation hypothesis model would predict, we found that binding for the inverse agonist, 11-cis-retinal (11CR), slowed when the sample contained more ops* (produced using M257Y, a constitutively activating mutation). Interestingly, the increased presence of ops* allowed for binding of the agonist, all-trans-retinal (ATR), whereas WT opsin showed no binding. Shifting the conformational equilibrium toward even more ops* using a G protein peptide mimic (either free in solution or fused to the receptor) accelerated the rate of ATR binding and slowed 11CR binding. An arrestin peptide mimic showed little effect on 11CR binding; however, it stabilized opsin · ATR complexes. The TM5/TM6 hole is apparently not involved in this conformational selection. Increasing its size by mutagenesis did not enable ATR binding but instead slowed 11CR binding, suggesting that it may play a role in trapping 11CR. In summary, our results indicate that conformational selection dictates stable retinal binding, which we propose involves ATR and 11CR binding to different states, the latter a previously unidentified, open-but-inactive conformation.

Indexed as

AnimalsArrestinBinding SitesCattleCrystallography, X-RayHumansModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutationPeptide FragmentsProtein ConformationReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRetinaldehydeRhodopsinSpectrometry, FluorescenceArrestinPeptide FragmentsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledRetinaldehyderetinal dimerRhodopsinArrestinConformational ChangeFluorescenceG-proteinG Protein-coupled Receptor (GPCR)Protein ConformationProtein DynamicRhodopsinStructural DynamicsVision

Identifiers

PMID25451936
PMCPMC4326838
OpenAlexW2094823192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.