Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25451824›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2015

Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?

Nicolas Barry Delongchamps, Arnaud Lefèvre, Naïm Bouazza, Frédéric Beuvon, Paul Legman, François Cornud

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Exploring the potential ofProstate international · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Ablation.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas Barry DelongchampsDepartment of Urology, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France. Electronic address: nicolasbdl@hotmail.com.
Arnaud LefèvreDepartment of Radiology, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Naïm BouazzaDepartment of Clinical Research, Tarnier Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Frédéric BeuvonDepartment of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Paul LegmanDepartment of Radiology, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
François CornudDepartment of Radiology, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Délégation Paris 5 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMagnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsies were suggested to detect significant cancer with more accuracy than systematic biopsies. In this study we evaluate the pathological characteristics of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging detected and undetected tumor foci on radical prostatectomy specimens. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe selected 125 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed on magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound targeted biopsy and/or systematic biopsy. On multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging each suspicious area was graded according to the PI-RADS score. On radical prostatectomy specimen, tumor foci with a Gleason score greater than 3+3 and/or tumor volume greater than 0.5 ml were considered significant. A correlation analysis between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and pathological findings was performed.

resultsPathological analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens detected 230 tumor foci. Of these, 137 were considered significant (Gleason score greater than 3+3 in 112) and were observed in 111 (89%) glands. A total of 95 individual tumor foci, including 14 significant foci, were missed with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. All of them were located in glands where another focus was detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. An additional 9 individual tumor foci, including 7 significant, were detected on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging but missed with targeted biopsy, resulting in 5 (4%) significant cancers undetected with magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy. The magnetic resonance imaging target largest diameter was associated with high volume (greater than 0.5 cc) foci detection, while PI-RADS score and cancer involvement on targeted biopsy were associated with significant foci detection.

conclusionsIn these series of men with suspicious prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings, magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion guided targeted biopsy alone strategy would have resulted in the under detection of only 4% significant cancers.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalMultimodal ImagingStandard of CareUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRectumbiopsyearly detection of cancerprostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25451824
OpenAlexW2077761842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.