ArticleThe Journal of urology2015
Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?
Article in The Journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Discordance Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound Volume Measurements on Prostate Fusion Biopsy Outcomes.The Journal of urology · 2025Trial
- Exploring the potential ofProstate international · 2024Article
- Short repetition time diffusion-weighted imaging improves visualization of prostate cancer.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Lesion volume on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging as a non-invasive prognosticator for clinically significant prostate cancer.Central European journal of urology · 2024Article
- Ki67 and the apparent diffusion coefficient in postoperative prostate cancer with endocrine therapy.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Robotic-assisted transrectal MRI-guided biopsy. Technical feasibility and role in the current diagnosis of prostate cancer: an initial single-center experience.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020Article
- MRI-directed high-frequency (29MhZ) TRUS-guided biopsies: initial results of a single-center study.European radiology · 2020Article
- Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Ablation.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2019Review
- The primacy of multiparametric MRI in men with suspected prostate cancer.European radiology · 2019Review
- Association of training level and outcome of software-based image fusion-guided targeted prostate biopsies.World journal of urology · 2019Article
- Whole mount histopathological correlation with prostate MRI in Grade I and II prostatectomy patients.International urology and nephrology · 2019Article
- Positive pre-biopsy MRI: are systematic biopsies still useful in addition to targeted biopsies?World journal of urology · 2019Review
- Clinical significance and predictors of oncologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for invisible prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI.BMC cancer · 2018Article
- Optimizing patient selection for focal therapy-mapping and ablating the index lesion.Translational andrology and urology · 2018Article
- Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: should we use quantitative metrics to better characterize focal lesions originating in the peripheral zone?European radiology · 2018Article
- Risk of upgrading from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy pathology: Is magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy more accurate?Journal of Cancer · 2018Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging targeted transperineal prostate biopsy: a local anaesthetic approach.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2017Article
- Precision of MRI/ultrasound-fusion biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis: an ex vivo comparison of alternative biopsy techniques on prostate phantoms.World journal of urology · 2017Article
- Multi-parametric MRI imaging of the prostate-implications for focal therapy.Translational andrology and urology · 2017Review
- Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3T for prostate cancer: correlation with tumor cell density and percentage Gleason pattern on whole mount pathology.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMagnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsies were suggested to detect significant cancer with more accuracy than systematic biopsies. In this study we evaluate the pathological characteristics of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging detected and undetected tumor foci on radical prostatectomy specimens. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe selected 125 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed on magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound targeted biopsy and/or systematic biopsy. On multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging each suspicious area was graded according to the PI-RADS score. On radical prostatectomy specimen, tumor foci with a Gleason score greater than 3+3 and/or tumor volume greater than 0.5 ml were considered significant. A correlation analysis between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and pathological findings was performed.
resultsPathological analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens detected 230 tumor foci. Of these, 137 were considered significant (Gleason score greater than 3+3 in 112) and were observed in 111 (89%) glands. A total of 95 individual tumor foci, including 14 significant foci, were missed with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. All of them were located in glands where another focus was detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. An additional 9 individual tumor foci, including 7 significant, were detected on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging but missed with targeted biopsy, resulting in 5 (4%) significant cancers undetected with magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy. The magnetic resonance imaging target largest diameter was associated with high volume (greater than 0.5 cc) foci detection, while PI-RADS score and cancer involvement on targeted biopsy were associated with significant foci detection.
conclusionsIn these series of men with suspicious prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings, magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion guided targeted biopsy alone strategy would have resulted in the under detection of only 4% significant cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.