Trial reportChest2014
One-year safety and efficacy study of arformoterol tartrate in patients with moderate to severe COPD.
Trial report in Chest, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00909779 (A Large Simple Safety Study of Arformoterol Tartrate Inhalation Solution in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Large Simple Safety Study of Arformoterol Tartrate Inhalation Solution in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term health-related quality-of-life and symptom response profiles with arformoterol in COPD: results from a 52-week trial.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018Trial
- Long-term safety and efficacy of formoterol fumarate inhalation solution in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseTrial
- Maintenance Therapy with Nebulizers in Patients with Stable COPD: Need for Reevaluation.Pulmonary therapy · 2020Review
- Nebulized Therapies in COPD: Past, Present, and the Future.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Review
- Recruitment of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) for research.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2018Article
- Review
- Inhaled therapies in patients with moderate COPD in clinical practice: current thinking.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018Review
- Health resource utilization for inpatients with COPD treated with nebulized arformoterol or nebulized formoterol.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017Article
- A review of nebulized drug delivery in COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016Review
- Defining the relationship between COPD and CVD: what are the implications for clinical practice?Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArformoterol tartrate (arformoterol, 15 μg bid) is a nebulized long-acting β2-agonist approved for maintenance treatment of COPD.
methodsThis was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Patients (aged ≥ 40 years with baseline FEV1 ≤ 65% predicted, FEV1 > 0.50 L, FEV1/FVC ≤ 70%, and ≥ 15 pack-year smoking history) received arformoterol (n = 420) or placebo (n = 421) for 1 year. The primary assessment was time from randomization to respiratory death or first COPD exacerbation-related hospitalization.
resultsAmong 841 patients randomized, 103 had ≥ 1 primary event (9.5% vs 15.0%, for arformoterol vs placebo, respectively). Patients who discontinued treatment for any reason (39.3% vs 49.9%, for arformoterol vs placebo, respectively) were followed for up to 1 year postrandomization to assess for primary events. Fewer patients receiving arformoterol than placebo experienced COPD exacerbation-related hospitalizations (9.0% vs 14.3%, respectively). Twelve patients (2.9%) receiving arformoterol and 10 patients (2.4%) receiving placebo died during the study. Risk for first respiratory serious adverse event was 50% lower with arformoterol than placebo (P = .003). Numerically more patients on arformoterol (13; 3.1%) than placebo (10; 2.4%) experienced cardiac serious adverse events; however, time-to-first cardiac serious adverse event was not significantly different. Improvements in trough FEV1 and FVC were greater with arformoterol (least-squares mean change from baseline vs placebo: 0.051 L, P = .030 and 0.075 L, P = .018, respectively). Significant improvements in quality of life (overall St. George's Hospital Respiratory Questionnaire and Clinical COPD Questionnaire) were observed with arformoterol vs placebo (P < .05).
conclusionsArformoterol demonstrated an approximately 40% lower risk of respiratory death or COPD exacerbation-related hospitalization over 1 year vs placebo. Arformoterol was well-tolerated and improved lung function vs placebo. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00909779; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.