Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25451111›Full record

ArticleBrain research2015

Head direction is coded more strongly than movement direction in a population of entorhinal neurons.

Florian Raudies, Mark P Brandon, G William Chapman, Michael E Hasselmo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigating Egocentric Tuning in Hippocampal CA1 Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sharp Tuning of Head Direction and Angular Head Velocity Cells in the Somatosensory Cortex.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The grid code for ordered experience.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Florian RaudiesCenter for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science, and Technology, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: fraudies@bu.edu.
Mark P BrandonDivision of Biological Science, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093-0357, USA.
G William ChapmanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Center for Systems Neuroscience and Graduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University, 2 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Michael E HasselmoCenter for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science, and Technology, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Center for Systems Neuroscience and Graduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University, 2 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

Funding

Prefrontal and Medial-Temporal Interactions in MemoryP50MH094263 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI MILLER, EARL K · 2011 to 2015
$8.7M
NEUROMODULATION AND CORTICAL MEMORY FUNCTIONR01MH060013 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI HASSELMO, MICHAEL E · 2000 to 2019
$6.8M
Mechanisms of Entorhinal Cortex FunctionR01MH061492 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI HASSELMO, MICHAEL E · 2000 to 2017
$5.0M
NIMH NIH HHS MH61492NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH094263NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060013NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH061492NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH60013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spatial firing pattern of entorhinal grid cells may be important for navigation. Many different computational models of grid cell firing use path integration based on movement direction and the associated movement speed to drive grid cells. However, the response of neurons to movement direction has rarely been tested, in contrast to multiple studies showing responses of neurons to head direction. Here, we analyzed the difference between head direction and movement direction during rat movement and analyzed cells recorded from entorhinal cortex for their tuning to movement direction. During foraging behavior, movement direction differs significantly from head direction. The analysis of neuron responses shows that only 5 out of 758 medial entorhinal cells show significant coding for both movement direction and head direction when evaluating periods of rat behavior with speeds above 10 cm/s and ±30° angular difference between movement and head direction. None of the cells coded movement direction alone. In contrast, 21 cells in this population coded only head direction during behavioral epochs with these constraints, indicating much stronger coding of head direction in this population. This suggests that the movement direction signal required by most grid cell models may arise from other brain structures than the medial entorhinal cortex. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Brain and Memory.

Indexed as

MovementAnimalsEntorhinal CortexHeadMaleModels, NeurologicalNeuronsRatsRats, Long-EvansSpatial NavigationAttractor modelEntorhinal cortexGrid cellMovement directionVelocity controlled oscillator model

Identifiers

PMID25451111
PMCPMC4427560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.