Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25450810›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta2015

The use of SMALPs as a novel membrane protein scaffold for structure study by negative stain electron microscopy.

Vincent Postis, Shaun Rawson, Jennifer K Mitchell, Sarah C Lee, Rosemary A Parslow, Tim R Dafforn, Stephen A Baldwin, Stephen P Muench

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. DNA-Lipid Nanodiscs with a Polyethylene Glycol Interface.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vincent PostisSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; Biomedicine Research Group, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, LS1 3HE, UK.
Shaun RawsonSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Jennifer K MitchellSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Sarah C LeeSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK.
Rosemary A ParslowSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK.
Tim R DaffornSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK.
Stephen A BaldwinSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Stephen P MuenchSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. Electronic address: s.p.muench@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council bb/j017310/1Medical Research Council g1000567Medical Research Council G1000567Wellcome Trust 009752/z/12/zWellcome Trust 019322/7/10/zWellcome Trust 102494/z/13/z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the great progress recently made in resolving their structures, investigation of the structural biology of membrane proteins still presents major challenges. Even with new technical advances such as lipidic cubic phase crystallisation, obtaining well-ordered crystals remains a significant hurdle in membrane protein X-ray crystallographic studies. As an alternative, electron microscopy has been shown to be capable of resolving >3.5Å resolution detail in membrane proteins of modest (~300 kDa) size, without the need for crystals. However, the conventional use of detergents for either approach presents several issues, including the possible effects on structure of removing the proteins from their natural membrane environment. As an alternative, it has recently been demonstrated that membrane proteins can be effectively isolated, in the absence of detergents, using a styrene maleic acid co-polymer (SMA). This approach yields SMA lipid particles (SMALPs) in which the membrane proteins are surrounded by a small disk of lipid bilayer encircled by polymer. Here we use the Escherichia coli secondary transporter AcrB as a model membrane protein to demonstrate how a SMALP scaffold can be used to visualise membrane proteins, embedded in a near-native lipid environment, by negative stain electron microscopy, yielding structures at a modest resolution in a short (days) timeframe. Moreover, we show that AcrB within a SMALP scaffold is significantly more active than the equivalent DDM stabilised form. The advantages of SMALP scaffolds within electron microscopy are discussed and we conclude that they may prove to be an important tool in studying membrane protein structure and function.

Indexed as

ATP-Binding Cassette, Sub-Family C ProteinsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsLipid BilayersMaleatesMicroscopy, ElectronPolystyrenesRecombinant ProteinsStaining and LabelingAcrB protein, E coliATP-Binding Cassette, Sub-Family C ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsLipid BilayersMaleatesPolystyrenesRecombinant Proteinsstyrene-maleic acid polymerAcrBElectron microscopyMembrane proteinSMALP

Identifiers

PMID25450810
PMCPMC4331651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.