Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25450296›Full record

ArticleFertility and sterility2015

Simple perfusion apparatus for manipulation, tracking, and study of oocytes and embryos.

Stephanie L Angione, Nathalie Oulhen, Lynae M Brayboy, Anubhav Tripathi, Gary M Wessel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fertility and sterility, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie L AngioneCenter for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Nathalie OulhenDepartment of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Lynae M BrayboyDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Anubhav TripathiCenter for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Gary M WesselDepartment of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. Electronic address: rhet@brown.edu.
Brown University · US

Funding

REPRODUCTIVE SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMK12HD000849 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Danny J Schust · 1988 to 2026
$33.2M
Post-translational Regulation of Germline DeterminantsR01HD028152 · NICHD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WESSEL, GARY M · 1997 to 2016
$3.9M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD000849NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD028152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and implement a device and protocol for oocyte analysis at a single cell level. The device must be capable of high resolution imaging, temperature control, perfusion of media, drugs, sperm, and immunolabeling reagents all at defined flow rates. Each oocyte and resultant embryo must remain spatially separated and defined.

designExperimental laboratory study.

settingUniversity and academic center for reproductive medicine. PATIENT(S)/ANIMAL(S): Women with eggs retrieved for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, adult female FVBN and B6C3F1 mouse strains, sea stars. INTERVENTION(S): Real-time, longitudinal imaging of oocytes after fluorescent labeling, insemination, and viability tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cell and embryo viability, immunolabeling efficiency, live cell endocytosis quantification, precise metrics of fertilization, and embryonic development. RESULT(S): Single oocytes were longitudinally imaged after significant changes in media, markers, endocytosis quantification, and development, all with supreme control by microfluidics. Cells remained viable, enclosed, and separate for precision measurements, repeatability, and imaging. CONCLUSION(S): We engineered a simple device to load, visualize, experiment, and effectively record individual oocytes and embryos without loss of cells. Prolonged incubation capabilities provide longitudinal studies without need for transfer and potential loss of cells. This simple perfusion apparatus provides for careful, precise, and flexible handling of precious samples facilitating clinical IVF approaches.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedCell SeparationCell TrackingEmbryo, MammalianEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleHumansMiceMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicromanipulationMicroscopyOocytescell viability assayendocytosis activityhydrodynamic trapmicrofluidicsOocyte

Identifiers

PMID25450296
PMCPMC4768872
OpenAlexW2118662108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.