Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25450127›Full record

ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2015

Validity of physical activity measures in individuals after total knee arthroplasty.

Gustavo J Almeida, David M Wert, Kelly S Brower, Sara R Piva

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gustavo J AlmeidaDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: gja4@pitt.edu.
David M WertDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Kelly S BrowerSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Sara R PivaDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827NIA NIH HHS P30-AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the concurrent criterion-related validity of 2 activity monitors in comparison with the criterion method of indirect calorimetry in older adults after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

designValidation study.

settingSubjects completed 9 increasingly demanding daily activities in a research laboratory; each activity was performed for 7 minutes, for a total of 80 minutes, while the activity monitors and criterion method were used concurrently.

participantsSubjects (N=21, 67% women) had a mean age ± SD of 68±7 years and a body mass index of 29±4.

interventionsNot applicable.

main outcome measuresEnergy expenditure (in kcal/min) measured by accelerometer-based and multisensor-based monitors and by a criterion method. Validity was assessed by the paired t test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plots comparing the measurements from the activity monitors with those of the criterion method.

resultsMeasurements from the accelerometer-based monitor were significantly lower than those of the criterion method across all walking and nonwalking activities. The underestimations ranged from 40% to 100%. The accelerometer-based monitor demonstrated small to moderate agreement compared with the criterion method (ICCs from 0 to .38). Measurements from the multisensor-based monitor were significantly lower than those of the criterion method during several nonwalking activities; yet, the differences were minor (2%-19%). Measurements from the multisensor-based monitor during walking activities were not different compared with the criterion method. The multisensor-based monitor demonstrated moderate to excellent agreement with the criterion method (ICCs from .48 to .81).

conclusionsThe multisensor-based monitor showed better criterion-related validity than the accelerometer-based monitor and should be considered as a tool to measure physical activity in individuals after TKA.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeMotor ActivityAccelerometryActivities of Daily LivingAgedCalorimetry, IndirectEnergy MetabolismFemaleHumansMaleMonitoring, AmbulatoryOsteoarthritis, KneeSurveys and QuestionnairesAccelerometryActivities of daily livingArthroplastyEnergy metabolismkneeReference standardsRehabilitationreplacementValidation studies

Identifiers

PMID25450127
PMCPMC4339513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.