Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25449938›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2014

Controversies: Optic nerve sheath fenestration versus shunt placement for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Arielle Spitze, Peter Lam, Nagham Al-Zubidi, Sushma Yalamanchili, Andrew G Lee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07191873 (A Phase IV Placebo-controlled Single Center Trial for Tirzepatide in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07191873 phase4recruitingstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Phase IV Placebo-controlled Single Center Trial for Tirzepatide in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Trial (TIIHT)

Ran2026Enrolled60Registered outcomes4Posted comparisons0ConditionsIdiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH)ArmsTirzepatide, Tirzepatide Placebo
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The management of elevated intracranial pressure and sinus vein thrombosis associated with mastoiditis: the experience of eighteen patients.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. How do presentation age and CSF opening pressure level affect long-term prognosis of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in children? Experience of a single tertiary clinic.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  10. [Treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension by endovascular improvement of venous drainage of the brain].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arielle Spitze
Peter Lam
Nagham Al-Zubidi
Sushma Yalamanchili
Andrew G LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Houston Methodist Hospital; Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Department of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston; Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA; Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Methodist Hospital · USBaylor College of Medicine · USCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) has been increasing in prevalence in the past decade, following the obesity epidemic. When medical treatment fails, surgical treatment options must be considered. However, controversy remains as to which surgical procedure is the preferred surgical option - optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting - for the long-term treatment of this syndrome. PURPOSE: To provide a clinical update of the pros and cons of ONSF versus shunt placement for the treatment of IIH.

designThis was a retrospective review of the current literature in the English language indexed in PubMed.

methodsThe authors conducted a PubMed search using the following terms: Idiopathic IIH, pseudotumor cerebri, ONSF, CSF shunts, vetriculo-peritoneal shunting, and lumbo-peritoneal shunting. The authors included pertinent and significant original articles, review articles, and case reports, which revealed the new aspects and updates in these topics.

resultsThe treatment of IIH remains controversial and lacks randomized controlled clinical trial data. Treatment of IIH rests with the determination of the severity of IIH-related visual loss and headache.

conclusionThe decision for ONSF versus shunting is somewhat institution and surgeon dependent. ONSF is preferred for patients with visual symptoms whereas shunting is reserved for patients with headache. There are positive and negative aspects of both procedures, and a prospective, randomized, controlled trial is needed (currently underway). This article will hopefully be helpful in allowing the reader to make a more informed decision until that time.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsHumansOptic NervePseudotumor Cerebri

Identifiers

PMID25449938
PMCPMC4278113
OpenAlexW2071306033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.