Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25449625›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials2014

Validation of molecular crystal structures from powder diffraction data with dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D).

Jacco van de Streek, Marcus A Neumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Crystal structure of seladelpar, CActa crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2026
    Article
  4. Best practices in `0 K' DFT energy calculations on molecular crystal structures.Acta crystallographica. Section C, Structural chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Crystal structure of the (1Acta crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2026
    Article
  6. Crystal structure of clofarabine (form I), CActa crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2026
    Article
  7. Avutometinib.Acta crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2026
    Article
  8. Levosimendan Form I, CActa crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2026
    Article
  9. Crystal structure of sunvozertinib, CActa crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2026
    Article
  10. Midodrine hydro-chloride Form A, CActa crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2026
    Article
  11. Crystal structure of binimetinib (Form A), CActa crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Bepostastine besylate.IUCrData · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Structure of entinostat Form B, CActa crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Structure Determination of Tegoprazan((Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacco van de StreekDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marcus A NeumannAvant-garde Materials Simulation Deutschland GmbH, Merzhauser Strasse 177, D-79100 Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2010 we energy-minimized 225 high-quality single-crystal (SX) structures with dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D) to establish a quantitative benchmark. For the current paper, 215 organic crystal structures determined from X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) data and published in an IUCr journal were energy-minimized with DFT-D and compared to the SX benchmark. The on average slightly less accurate atomic coordinates of XRPD structures do lead to systematically higher root mean square Cartesian displacement (RMSCD) values upon energy minimization than for SX structures, but the RMSCD value is still a good indicator for the detection of structures that deserve a closer look. The upper RMSCD limit for a correct structure must be increased from 0.25 Å for SX structures to 0.35 Å for XRPD structures; the grey area must be extended from 0.30 to 0.40 Å. Based on the energy minimizations, three structures are re-refined to give more precise atomic coordinates. For six structures our calculations provide the missing positions for the H atoms, for five structures they provide corrected positions for some H atoms. Seven crystal structures showed a minor error for a non-H atom. For five structures the energy minimizations suggest a higher space-group symmetry. For the 225 SX structures, the only deviations observed upon energy minimization were three minor H-atom related issues. Preferred orientation is the most important cause of problems. A preferred-orientation correction is the only correction where the experimental data are modified to fit the model. We conclude that molecular crystal structures determined from powder diffraction data that are published in IUCr journals are of high quality, with less than 4% containing an error in a non-H atom.

Indexed as

dispersion-corrected density functional theoryenergy mimimizationpowder data validation

Identifiers

PMID25449625
PMCPMC4468513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.