Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25449533›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2015

Inoculation stress hypothesis of environmental enrichment.

Elizabeth J Crofton, Yafang Zhang, Thomas A Green

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neural Mechanisms of Social Homeostasis: Dynamic Range Plasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Responses to Reduced Feeding Frequency in Captive-Born Cheetahs (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth J CroftonCenter for Addiction Research, Mitchell Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555, United States.
Yafang ZhangCenter for Addiction Research, Mitchell Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555, United States.
Thomas A GreenCenter for Addiction Research, Mitchell Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555, United States. Electronic address: tom.green@utmb.edu.

Funding

Translational Explorations in Substance Use DisordersT32DA007287 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI Kathryn A. Cunningham, Jonathan Dean Hommel · 1994 to 2026
$4.7M
Amygdala Serotonin Neurotransmission and Neuropathic PainR01NS081121 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GREEN, THOMAS ARTHUR, NEUGEBAUER, VOLKER · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
Molecular Mechanisms of Environmental EnrichmentR01DA029091 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GREEN, THOMAS ARTHUR · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS DA007287NIDA NIH HHS DA029091NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029091NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007287NINDS NIH HHS NS081121NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One hallmark of psychiatric conditions is the vast continuum of individual differences in susceptibility vs. resilience resulting from the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. The environmental enrichment paradigm is an animal model that is useful for studying a range of psychiatric conditions, including protective phenotypes in addiction and depression models. The major question is how environmental enrichment, a non-drug and non-surgical manipulation, can produce such robust individual differences in such a wide range of behaviors. This paper draws from a variety of published sources to outline a coherent hypothesis of inoculation stress as a factor producing the protective enrichment phenotypes. The basic tenet suggests that chronic mild stress from living in a complex environment and interacting non-aggressively with conspecifics can inoculate enriched rats against subsequent stressors and/or drugs of abuse. This paper reviews the enrichment phenotypes, mulls the fundamental nature of environmental enrichment vs. isolation, discusses the most appropriate control for environmental enrichment, and challenges the idea that cortisol/corticosterone equals stress. The intent of the inoculation stress hypothesis of environmental enrichment is to provide a scaffold with which to build testable hypotheses for the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying these protective phenotypes and thus provide new therapeutic targets to treat psychiatric/neurological conditions.

Indexed as

EnvironmentStress, PsychologicalAnimalsHousing, AnimalHumansResilience, PsychologicalCorticosteroneDrug addictionEnvironmental enrichmentInoculation stressResilience

Identifiers

PMID25449533
PMCPMC4305384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.