Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25449160›Full record

ArticleVision research2015

Correlation of vision loss with tactile-evoked V1 responses in retinitis pigmentosa.

Samantha I Cunningham, James D Weiland, Pinglei Bao, Gilberto Raul Lopez-Jaime, Bosco S Tjan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Visual Cortical Plasticity in Retinitis Pigmentosa.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2019
    Article
  11. Now is the Critical Time for Engineered Neuroplasticity.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samantha I CunninghamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. Electronic address: samicunn@gmail.com.
James D WeilandDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. Electronic address: jweiland@med.usc.edu.
Pinglei BaoNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. Electronic address: plbao.usc@gmail.com.
Gilberto Raul Lopez-JaimeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. Electronic address: rlopezjaime@yahoo.com.mx.
Bosco S TjanNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. Electronic address: btjan@usc.edu.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Form Processing in Peripheral VisionR01EY017707 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHEN, NIHONG, CHUNG, SUSANA T · 2008 to 2018
$3.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies have shown that the visual cortex of visually impaired humans is active during tactile tasks. We sought to determine if this cross-modal activation in the primary visual cortex is correlated with vision loss in individuals with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), an inherited degenerative photoreceptor disease that progressively diminishes vision later in life. RP and sighted subjects completed three tactile tasks: a symmetry discrimination task, a Braille-dot counting task, and a sandpaper roughness discrimination task. We measured tactile-evoked blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) responses using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). For each subject, we quantified the cortical extent of the tactile-evoked response by the proportion of modulated voxels within the primary visual cortex (V1) and its strength by the mean absolute modulation amplitude of the modulated voxels. We characterized vision loss in terms of visual acuity and the areal proportion of V1 that corresponds to the preserved visual field. Visual acuity and proportion of the preserved visual field both had a highly significant effect on the cortical extent of the V1 BOLD response to tactile stimulation, while visual acuity also had a significant effect on the strength of the V1 response. These effects of vision loss on cross-modal responses were reliable despite high inter-subject variability. Controlling for task-evoked responses in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) across subjects further strengthened the effects of vision loss on cross-model responses in V1. We propose that such cross-modal responses in V1 and other visual areas may be used as a cortically localized biomarker to account for individual differences in visual performance following sight recovery treatments.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceBlindnessEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuronal PlasticityRetinitis PigmentosaSomatosensory CortexTouch PerceptionVisual AcuityVisual CortexCross-modal plasticityfMRIPrimary somatosensory cortexPrimary visual cortexRetinitis pigmentosaTactile-evoked response

Identifiers

PMID25449160
PMCPMC4417660
OpenAlexW2014091717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.