Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25448116›Full record

ReviewVision research2016

Microsaccade production during saccade cancelation in a stop-signal task.

David C Godlove, Jeffrey D Schall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spatial and Temporal Factors Influencing Fixational Saccades.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dissociation of Medial Frontal β-Bursts and Executive Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  7. Microsaccadic modulation evoked by emotional events.Journal of physiological anthropology · 2020
    Review
  8. Express saccades during a countermanding task.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Models of inhibitory control.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David C GodloveDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Center for Integrative & Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Jeffrey D SchallDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Center for Integrative & Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA. Electronic address: jeffrey.d.schall@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Shop Module CoreP30EY008126 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Kevin L Schey · 1989 to 2026
$19.6M
THREE-TIERED PREVENTION MODEL TO BETTER SERVE ALL STUDENP30HD015052 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 1985 to 2014
$18.6M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
NEURAL CONTROL OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENTR01MH055806 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SCHALL, JEFFREY D · 1996 to 2016
$5.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008126NEI NIH HHS P30-EY08126NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD015052NICHD NIH HHS P30-HD015052NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH055806NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH55806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We obtained behavioral data to evaluate two alternative hypotheses about the neural mechanisms of gaze control. The "fixation" hypothesis states that neurons in rostral superior colliculus (SC) enforce fixation of gaze. The "microsaccade" hypothesis states that neurons in rostral SC encode microsaccades rather than fixation per se. Previously reported neuronal activity in monkey SC during the saccade stop-signal task leads to specific, dissociable behavioral predictions of these two hypotheses. When subjects are required to cancel partially-prepared saccades, imbalanced activity spreads across rostral and caudal SC with a reliable temporal profile. The microsaccade hypothesis predicts that this imbalance will lead to elevated microsaccade production biased toward the target location, while the fixation hypothesis predicts reduced microsaccade production. We tested these predictions by analyzing the microsaccades produced by 4 monkeys while they voluntarily canceled partially prepared eye movements in response to explicit stop signals. Consistent with the fixation hypothesis and contradicting the microsaccade hypothesis, we found that each subject produced significantly fewer microsaccades when normal saccades were successfully canceled. The few microsaccades escaping this inhibition tended to be directed toward the target location. We additionally investigated interactions between initiating microsaccades and inhibiting normal saccades. Reaction times were longer when microsaccades immediately preceded target presentation. However, pre-target microsaccade production did not affect stop-signal reaction time or alter the probability of canceling saccades following stop signals. These findings demonstrate that imbalanced activity within SC does not necessarily produce microsaccades and add to evidence that saccade preparation and cancelation are separate processes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionFixation, OcularHumansInhibition, PsychologicalModels, TheoreticalNeuronsReaction TimeSaccadesSuperior ColliculiVisual PerceptionFixation neuronsFrontal eye fieldPremotor theory of attentionResponse inhibitionRostral superior colliculus

Identifiers

PMID25448116
PMCPMC4422788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.