ArticleThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2015
Serial monitoring of exhaled nitric oxide in lung transplant recipients.
Article in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-lung transplant surveillance in 2026: current practice, variability, and the need for standardization.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Review
- Perioperative Exhaled Nitric Oxide as an Indicator for Postoperative Pneumonia in Surgical Lung Cancer Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study Based on 183 Cases.Canadian respiratory journal · 2022Article
- Radiographic Graft Surveillance in Lung Transplantation: Prognostic Role of Parametric Response Mapping.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021Article
- Application of nitric oxide measurements in clinical conditions beyond asthma.European clinical respiratory journal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a marker of airway inflammation, is often elevated in lung transplant recipients (LTxRs) with acute rejection or infection. Isolated measurements in the setting of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome have been variable. We sought to assess the utility of serial FeNO in predicting chronic allograft dysfunction or the presence of acute rejection or infection.
methodsEighty-six LTxRs underwent 325 serial FeNO measurements at an expiratory flow rate of 50 ml/s. The change in FeNO (ΔFeNO) between two measurements obtained during a stable state (ΔFeNO-SS) was compared with ΔFeNO, where the first measurement was taken during a stable state and the second during an unstable state (defined as a subsequent decline in FEV1 > 10% over 3 months [ΔFeNO-SU]) or an acute complication (acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis or acute infection [ΔFeNO-SAC]). The median follow-up time after the baseline FeNO was 10 (range 3 to 25) months.
resultsΔFeNO-SS in 117 FeNO pairs was similar to ΔFeNO-SU in 26 pairs (2.1 ± 3 ppb vs 2.3 ± 4 ppb; p = 0.2). ΔFeNO-SAC in 17 pairs was markedly increased (27 ± 20 ppb; p < 0.001 vs ΔFeNO-SS). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for ΔFeNO in detecting an acute complication was 0.93 (p < 0.001). By applying a cut-off of >10 ppb, the sensitivity and specificity was 82% and 100%, respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 97.5%.
conclusionsChanges in FeNO may serve as a useful adjunct in the detection of acute complications after lung transplantation. In this limited analysis, ΔFeNO was not predictive of a subsequent decline in allograft function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.