Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25447482›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2015

Acute effects of light on the brain and behavior of diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus and nocturnal Mus musculus.

Dorela D Shuboni, Shannon L Cramm, Lily Yan, Chidambaram Ramanathan, Breyanna L Cavanaugh, Antonio A Nunez, Laura Smale

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dorela D ShuboniDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Shannon L CrammDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Lily YanDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Chidambaram RamanathanDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Breyanna L CavanaughNeuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Antonio A NunezDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Laura SmaleDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. Electronic address: smale@msu.edu.
Michigan State University · US

Funding

The Psychobiology of Rhythms in Diurnal MammalsR01MH053433 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SMALE, LAURA · 1995 to 2009
$2.4M
Integrative Neurobiology of Social ProcessesT32MH070343 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BREEDLOVE, S MARC · 2004 to 2013
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH053433NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH070343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photic cues influence daily patterns of activity via two complementary mechanisms: (1) entraining the internal circadian clock and (2) directly increasing or decreasing activity, a phenomenon referred to as "masking". The direction of this masking response is dependent on the temporal niche an organism occupies, as nocturnal animals often decrease activity when exposed to light, while the opposite response is more likely to be seen in diurnal animals. Little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying these differences. Here, we examined the masking effects of light on behavior and the activation of several brain regions by that light, in diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus (Nile grass rats) and nocturnal Mus musculus (mice). Each species displayed the expected behavioral response to a 1h pulse of light presented 2h after lights-off, with the diurnal grass rats and nocturnal mice increasing and decreasing their activity, respectively. In grass rats light induced an increase in cFOS in all retinorecipient areas examined, which included the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the ventral subparaventricular zone (vSPZ), intergeniculate leaflet (IGL), lateral habenula (LH), olivary pretectal nucleus (OPT) and the dorsal lateral geniculate (DLG). In mice, light led to an increase in cFOS in one of these regions (SCN), no change in others (vSPZ, IGL and LH) and a decrease in two (OPT and DLG). In addition, light increased cFOS expression in three arousal-related brain regions (the lateral hypothalamus, dorsal raphe, and locus coeruleus) and in one sleep-promoting region (the ventrolateral preoptic area) in grass rats. In mice, light had no effect on cFOS in these four regions. Taken together, these results highlight several brain regions whose responses to light suggest that they may play a role in masking, and that the possibility that they contribute to species-specific patterns of behavioral responses to light should be explored in future.

Indexed as

LightActigraphyAnimalsBrainCircadian RhythmFemaleImmunohistochemistryMaleMotor ActivityMurinaePhotic StimulationPhotomicrographyProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosSpecies SpecificityProto-Oncogene Proteins c-foscFOSDiurnalityMaskingNocturnalityTemporal niche

Identifiers

PMID25447482
PMCPMC4312475
OpenAlexW2057034782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.