Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25447035›Full record

ArticleResuscitation2015

Code status and resuscitation options in the electronic health record.

Haresh L Bhatia, Neal R Patel, Neesha N Choma, Jonathan Grande, Dario A Giuse, Christoph U Lehmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haresh L BhatiaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States. Electronic address: haresh.bhatia@vanderbilt.edu.
Neal R PatelDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States.
Neesha N ChomaDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States.
Jonathan GrandeInformatics Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States.
Dario A GiuseDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States; Informatics Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States.
Christoph U LehmannDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States.

Funding

Vanderbilt Biomedical Informatics Training ProgramT15LM007450 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica S. Ancker, Bradley A. Malin · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
NLM NIH HHS 2T15 LM 007450NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe advance discussion and documentation of code-status is important in preventing undesired cardiopulmonary resuscitation and related end of life interventions. Code-status documentation remains infrequent and paper-based, which limits its usefulness. This study evaluates a tool to document code-status in the electronic health records at a large teaching hospital, and analyzes the corresponding data.

methodsEncounter data for patients admitted to the Medical Center were collected over a period of 12 months (01-APR-2012-31-MAR-2013) and the code-status attribute was tracked for individual patients. The code-status data were analyzed separately for adult and pediatric patient populations. We considered 131,399 encounters for 83,248 adult patients and 80,778 encounters for 55,656 pediatric patients in this study.

results71% of the adult patients and 30% of the pediatric patients studied had a documented code-status. Age and severity of illness influenced the decision to document code-status. Demographics such as gender, race, ethnicity, and proximity of primary residence were also associated with the documentation of code-status.

conclusionAbsence of a recorded code-status may result in unnecessary interventions. Code-status in paper charts may be difficult to access in cardiopulmonary arrest situations and may result in unnecessary and unwanted interventions and procedures. Documentation of code-status in electronic records creates a readily available reference for care providers.

Indexed as

Advance Directive AdherenceCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCurrent Procedural TerminologyPatient ParticipationResuscitation OrdersAdultChildElectronic Health RecordsHospitals, TeachingHumansTerminal CareUnited StatesUnnecessary ProceduresAdvance directivesCode statusElectronic health recordEnd of life careProvider communication

Identifiers

PMID25447035
PMCPMC4293350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.