Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25446819›Full record

ReviewVaccine2015

Live virus vaccines based on a yellow fever vaccine backbone: standardized template with key considerations for a risk/benefit assessment.

Thomas P Monath, Stephen J Seligman, James S Robertson, Bruno Guy, Edward B Hayes, Richard C Condit, Jean Louis Excler, Lisa Marie Mac, Baevin Carbery, Robert T Chen and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05568953 (An Experimental Medicine Decipher of a Minimum Correlate of Cellular Immunity), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05568953 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

An Experimental Medicine Decipher of a Minimum Correlate of Cellular Immunity

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingapore General HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled70ConditionsInfectious Disease, Yellow Fever, Japanese Encephalitis, Viral InfectionArmsStamaril, Imojev, Ixiaro
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Thomas P MonathKleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Stephen J SeligmanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA. Electronic address: stephen_seligman@nymc.edu.
James S RobertsonNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Blanche Lane, South Mimms, Potters Bar, UK.
Bruno GuyDiscovery Department, Sanofi Pasteur, 69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Edward B HayesBarcelona Centre for International Health Research (CRESIB), 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Richard C ConditDepartment of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Jean Louis ExclerInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI), New York, NY 10004, USA; U.S. Military HIV Research Program (MHRP), Bethesda, MD 20817, USA.
Lisa Marie MacDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Baevin CarberyDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Robert T ChenDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Brighton Collaboration Viral Vector Vaccines Safety Working Group (V3SWG)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USBarcelona Centre for International Affairs · ESInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative · USNational Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD and TB Prevention · USNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control · GBNew York Medical College · USSanofi (France) · FRUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Brighton Collaboration Viral Vector Vaccines Safety Working Group (V3SWG) was formed to evaluate the safety of live, recombinant viral vaccines incorporating genes from heterologous viruses inserted into the backbone of another virus (so-called "chimeric virus vaccines"). Many viral vector vaccines are in advanced clinical trials. The first such vaccine to be approved for marketing (to date in Australia, Thailand, Malaysia, and the Philippines) is a vaccine against the flavivirus, Japanese encephalitis (JE), which employs a licensed vaccine (yellow fever 17D) as a vector. In this vaccine, two envelope proteins (prM-E) of YF 17D virus were exchanged for the corresponding genes of JE virus, with additional attenuating mutations incorporated into the JE gene inserts. Similar vaccines have been constructed by inserting prM-E genes of dengue and West Nile into YF 17D virus and are in late stage clinical studies. The dengue vaccine is, however, more complex in that it requires a mixture of four live vectors each expressing one of the four dengue serotypes. This vaccine has been evaluated in multiple clinical trials. No significant safety concerns have been found. The Phase 3 trials met their endpoints in terms of overall reduction of confirmed dengue fever, and, most importantly a significant reduction in severe dengue and hospitalization due to dengue. However, based on results that have been published so far, efficacy in preventing serotype 2 infection is less than that for the other three serotypes. In the development of these chimeric vaccines, an important series of comparative studies of safety and efficacy were made using the parental YF 17D vaccine virus as a benchmark. In this paper, we use a standardized template describing the key characteristics of the novel flavivirus vaccine vectors, in comparison to the parental YF 17D vaccine. The template facilitates scientific discourse among key stakeholders by increasing the transparency and comparability of information. The Brighton Collaboration V3SWG template may also be useful as a guide to the evaluation of other recombinant viral vector vaccines.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersGenetic VectorsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, SyntheticViral VaccinesYellow fever virusDrug CarriersVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, SyntheticViral VaccinesBrighton CollaborationRisk/benefit assessmentVaccinesVaccine safetyViral vectorYellow fever vaccine

Identifiers

PMID25446819
PMCPMC4656044
OpenAlexW2065311998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.