Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25446773›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2015

Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Considerations for the Development of Antibody Drug Conjugates.

Amrita V Kamath, Suhasini Iyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Resistance to antibody-drug conjugates: A review.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Antibody-Drug Conjugates-Evolution and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amrita V KamathDepartment of Preclinical and Translational Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way (Mailstop 463A), South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. kamath.amrita@gene.com.
Suhasini IyerDepartment of Preclinical and Translational Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way (Mailstop 463A), South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging new class of targeted therapeutics for cancer that use antibodies to deliver cytotoxic drugs to cancer cells. There are two FDA approved ADCs on the market and over 30 ADCs in the clinical pipeline against a number of different cancer types. The structure of an ADC is very complex with multiple components and considerable efforts are ongoing to determine the attributes necessary for clinical success. Understanding the pharmacokinetics of an ADC and how it impacts efficacy and toxicity is a critical part of optimizing ADC design and delivery i.e., dose and schedule. This review discusses the pharmacokinetic considerations for an ADC and tools and strategies that can be used to evaluate molecules at the preclinical stage.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsBiotransformationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansImmunoconjugatesMolecular Targeted TherapyAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugatesantibody drug conjugatebiotherapeuticscancerpharmacokineticspreclinical

Identifiers

PMID25446773
PMCPMC4596897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.