Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25446768›Full record

Trial reportPaediatric drugs2014

A thickened amino-acid formula in infants with cow's milk allergy failing to respond to protein hydrolysate formulas: a randomized double-blind trial.

Christophe Dupont, Nicolas Kalach, Pascale Soulaines, Elena Bradatan, Alain Lachaux, François Payot, Frédéric de Blay, Lydie Guénard-Bilbault, Riad Hatahet, Sandra Mulier

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Paediatric drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01940068 (A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of a Thickened Amino-acid-based Formula in Children Allergic to Cow's Milk and to Protein Hydrolysates), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01940068 nacompletednot on this map

A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of a Thickened Amino-acid-based Formula in Children Allergic to Cow's Milk and to Protein Hydrolysates

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnited PharmaceuticalsRan2011 to 2013Enrolled86ConditionsCow Milk AllergyArmsAmino acid based formula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Christophe DupontPediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Department, Necker Children's Hospital, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France, christophe.dupont@nck.aphp.fr.
Nicolas Kalach
Pascale Soulaines
Elena Bradatan
Alain Lachaux
François Payot
Frédéric de Blay
Lydie Guénard-Bilbault
Riad Hatahet
Sandra Mulier
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional de Namur · BEGroupe Hospitalier de l'Institut Catholique de Lille · FRQueen Fabiola Children's University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmino-acid-based formulas (AAFs) are recommended for children with cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) failing to respond to extensively hydrolyzed formulas (eHFs).

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the tolerance/hypoallergenicity and efficacy of a thickened AAF (TAAF) in these infants.

methodsThis multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (NCT01940068) compared 3-month feeding with a pectin-based TAAF (Novalac(®), United Pharmaceuticals, Paris, France) and a commercially available "reference" AAF (RAAF; Neocate(®), Nutricia, Germany) in infants aged <18 months with CMPA and persistent allergy symptoms with eHF feeding. Reported here are the results of an interim analysis after 1 month of feeding.

resultsOf the 86 infants randomized, CMPA with eHF intolerance was confirmed in 75 infants; all of them tolerated the allocated AAFs. The major allergic symptom disappeared within 1 month in 61.9 and 51.5 % and regurgitations disappeared in 66.7 and 42.3 % of infants who received TAAF and RAAF, respectively. Infants had significantly more normal stools (soft or formed consistency) with the TAAF (90.5 vs. 66.7 %; p = 0.011). From baseline, daily family life significantly improved with both AAFs: crying time decreased by 97.3 (p < 0.001) and 28.6 min (p = 0.014) and sleeping time increased by 64.6 (p = 0.009) and 29.0 min with TAAF and RAAF, respectively. At day 30, weight and body mass index z-score gains were 0.1 and 0.2 with TAAF and 0.2 and 0.0 with RAAF.

conclusionBoth AAFs were well tolerated by infants with CMPA and eHF intolerance and ensured appropriate growth, with the TAAF providing additional comfort.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimalsCarbohydratesCattleDietary FatsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfantInfant FormulaMaleMilk HypersensitivityProtein HydrolysatesAmino AcidsCarbohydratesDietary FatsNeocateProtein Hydrolysates

Identifiers

PMID25446768
OpenAlexW2009133832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.