ReviewMathematical biosciences2015
The inverse problem in mathematical biology.
Review in Mathematical biosciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical design of a synthetic microbiome that suppresses diverse gut pathogens.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Extraction of geometric and transport parameters from the time constant of exocytosis transients measured by nanoscale electrodes.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2025Article
- Description of an activity-based enzyme biosensor for lung cancer detection.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Generalized statistics: Applications to data inverse problems with outlier-resistance.PloS one · 2023Article
- PhysiCOOL: A generalized framework for model Calibration and Optimization Of modeLing projects.GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2023Article
- A dynamically structured matrix population model for insect life histories observed under variable environmental conditions.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Nonlinear model-based cardiac arrhythmia diagnosis using the optimization-based inverse problem solution.Biomedical engineering letters · 2022Article
- Bespoke Turing Systems.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Characterizing the type 2 diabetes mellitus epidemic in Jordan up to 2050.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Time-continuous and time-discrete SIR models revisited: theory and applications.Advances in difference equations · 2020Article
- Parameter estimation in models of biological oscillators: an automated regularised estimation approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Model-Based Quantification of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Critically Ill Patients with Atrial Fibrillation from Routine Data: A Feasibility Study.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2019Article
- A dynamic model of lignin biosynthesis inBiotechnology for biofuels · 2018Article
- The best models of metabolism.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2017Review
- Robust and efficient parameter estimation in dynamic models of biological systems.BMC systems biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological systems present particular challengers to model for the purposes of formulating predictions of generating biological insight. These systems are typically multi-scale, complex, and empirical observations are often sparse and subject to variability and uncertainty. This manuscript will review some of these specific challenges and introduce current methods used by modelers to construct meaningful solutions, in the context of preserving biological relevance. Opportunities to expand these methods are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.