Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25445603›Full record

ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2014

High abundant protein removal from rodent blood for biomarker discovery.

Dominik R Haudenschild, Angela Eldridge, Pamela J Lein, Brett A Chromy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomaterials for biomarker imaging and detection.Journal of advanced research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dominik R Haudenschild
Angela Eldridge
Pamela J Lein
Brett A Chromy
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Biomarkers of Organophosphorus Pesticide-Induced NeurotoxicityR01ES016308 · NIEHS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ANGER, WYNDHAM KENT, LEIN, PAMELA J · 2008 to 2011
$2.6M
Novel Early Intervention to Prevent Post-Traumatic OsteoarthritisR21AR063348 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HAUDENSCHILD, DOMINIK R · 2012 to 2013
$372k
NIAMS NIH HHS NIHR21-AR063348NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR063348NIEHS NIH HHS NIHR01-ES016308NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to realize the goal of stratified and/or personalized medicine in the clinic, significant advances in the field of biomarker discovery are necessary. Adding to the abundance of nucleic acid biomarkers being characterized, additional protein biomarkers will be needed to satisfy diverse clinical needs. An appropriate source for finding these biomarkers is within blood, as it contains tissue leakage factors as well as additional proteins that reside in blood that can be linked to the presence of disease. Unfortunately, high abundant proteins and complexity of the blood proteome present significant challenges for the discovery of protein biomarkers from blood. Animal models often enable the discovery of biomarkers that can later be translated to humans. Therefore, determining appropriate sample preparation of proteomic samples in rodent models is an important research goal. Here, we examined both mouse and rat blood samples (including both serum and plasma), for appropriate high abundant protein removal techniques for subsequent gel-based proteomic experiments. We assessed four methods of albumin removal: antibody-based affinity chromatography (MARS), Cibacron® Blue-based affinity depletion (SwellGel® Blue Albumin Removal Kit), protein-based affinity depletion (ProteaPrep Albumin Depletion Kit) and TCA/acetone precipitation. Albumin removal was quantified for each method and SDS-PAGE and 2-DE gels were used to quantify the number of protein spots obtained following albumin removal. Our results suggest that while all four approaches can effectively remove high abundant proteins, antibody-based affinity chromatography is superior to the other three methods.

Indexed as

AlbuminsAnimalsBiomarkersChromatography, AffinityElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalMiceProteomicsRatsAlbuminsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID25445603
PMCPMC4309281
OpenAlexW2052752021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.