ReviewResearch in microbiology2015
Genomes, neurotoxins and biology of Clostridium botulinum Group I and Group II.
Review in Research in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guideline
- Structure and functional divergence of the non-canonical BoNT-like toxin PG1 and PG2.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Isolation and Characterization of Botulinum Neurotoxin-ProducingChina CDC weekly · 2026Article
- Tracing and characterization of a family outbreak of subtype B2 botulism linked to homemade pickled eggs in Jinan, China.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- ProteolyticFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Elucidating the activation mechanism of botulinum neurotoxin a: role of α-clostripain and NTNH.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Foodborne Botulism Caused byMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Botulinum Neurotoxins as Two-Faced Janus Proteins.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Article
- Opportunistic Features of Non-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Closed genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024Article
- Modeling inactivation of non-proteolyticFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Complete genomes ofMicrobial genomics · 2024Article
- Comparative Phylogenetic Analysis and Protein Prediction Reveal the Taxonomy and Diverse Distribution of Virulence Factors in FoodborneEvolutionary bioinformatics online · 2024Article
- Pathogenicity and virulence ofVirulence · 2023Review
- Physical Treatments to ControlFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Collection and curation of prokaryotic genome assemblies from type strains at NCBI.International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Structural Analysis ofToxins · 2023Review
- Microbiological safety of aged meat.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Article
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent developments in whole genome sequencing have made a substantial contribution to understanding the genomes, neurotoxins and biology of Clostridium botulinum Group I (proteolytic C. botulinum) and C. botulinum Group II (non-proteolytic C. botulinum). Two different approaches are used to study genomics in these bacteria; comparative whole genome microarrays and direct comparison of complete genome DNA sequences. The properties of the different types of neurotoxin formed, and different neurotoxin gene clusters found in C. botulinum Groups I and II are explored. Specific examples of botulinum neurotoxin genes are chosen for an in-depth discussion of neurotoxin gene evolution. The most recent cases of foodborne botulism are summarised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.