Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25444012›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2015

The National Spina Bifida Patient Registry: profile of a large cohort of participants from the first 10 clinics.

Kathleen J Sawin, Tiebin Liu, Elisabeth Ward, Judy Thibadeau, Michael S Schechter, Minn M Soe, William Walker, NSBPR Coordinating Committee

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. What has changed in pediatric neurosurgical care in spina bifida? A 30-year UAB/Children's of Alabama observational overview.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kathleen J SawinUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI; Milwaukee/Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI. Electronic address: sawin@uwm.edu.
Tiebin LiuCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Elisabeth WardCarter Consulting, Inc, Consultant to Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Judy ThibadeauMilwaukee/Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Michael S SchechterChildren's Hospital of Richmond, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Minn M SoeDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
William WalkerDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
NSBPR Coordinating Committee

Funding

National Spina Bifida Registry Longitudinal Data Collection and EvaluationU01DD000766 · DD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI THOMAN, KATHERINE · 2011 to 2013
$175k
National Spina Bifida Registry - Children's Memorial Hospital Spina Bifida ClinicU01DD000744 · DD · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI BOWMAN, ROBIN · 2011 to 2013
$173k
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD000744PHS HHS 1UO1DDD000744.01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo use data from the US National Spina Bifida Patient Registry (NSBPR) to describe variations in Contexts of Care, Processes of Care, and Health Outcomes among individuals with spina bifida (SB) receiving care in 10 clinics. STUDY

designReported here are baseline cross-sectional data representing the first visit of 2172 participants from 10 specialized, multidisciplinary SB clinics participating in the NSBPR. We used descriptive statistics, the Fisher exact test, χ(2) test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test to examine the data.

resultsThe mean age was 10.1 (SD 8.1) years with slightly more female subjects (52.5%). The majority was white (63.4%) and relied upon public insurance (53.5%). One-third had sacral lesions, 44.8% had mid-low lumbar lesions, and 24.9% had high lumbar and thoracic lesions. The most common surgery was ventricular shunt placement (65.7%). The most common bladder-management technique among those with bladder impairment was intermittent catheterization (69.0%). Almost 14% experienced a pressure ulcer in the last year. Of those ages 5 years or older with bowel or bladder impairments, almost 30% were continent of stool; a similar percentage was continent of urine. Most variables were associated with type of SB diagnosis.

conclusionThe NSBPR provides a cross section of a predominantly pediatric population of patients followed in specialized SB programs. There were wide variations in the variables studied and major differences in Context of Care, Processes of Care, and Health Outcomes by type of SB. Such wide variation and the differences by type of SB should be considered in future analyses of outcomes.

Indexed as

RegistriesSpinal DysraphismAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25444012
PMCPMC4535790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.