Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25443765›Full record

Observational studyAtencion primaria

[Psychosocial stress environment and health workers in public health: Differences between primary and hospital care].

Antonio García-Rodríguez, Mario Gutiérrez-Bedmar, Juan Ángel Bellón-Saameño, Carlos Muñoz-Bravo, Joaquín Fernández-Crehuet Navajas

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Atencion primaria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Occupational Psychosocial Factors in Primary Care Continuing Care Staff.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quality of life and psychosocial risks in primary care workers in an urban area.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonio García-RodríguezDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España. Electronic address: antoniogr@uma.es.
Mario Gutiérrez-BedmarDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España.
Juan Ángel Bellón-SaameñoDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España; Centro de Salud El Palo, Distrito Sanitario de Atención Primaria Málaga-Guadalhorce, Servicio Andaluz de Salud (SAS), Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y de Promoción de la Salud (redIAPP), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, España.
Carlos Muñoz-BravoDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España.
Joaquín Fernández-Crehuet NavajasDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España; Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the psychosocial environment of health professionals in public health in primary and hospital care, and compare it with that of the general Spanish working population, as well as to evaluate the effect of psychosocial risk factors on symptoms related to perceived stress.

designCross-sectional study with stratified random sampling.

settingHealth care workers in the province of Granada, distributed in 5 hospitals and 4 health districts.

participantsA total of 738 employees (medical and nursing staff) of the Andalusian Health Service (SAS) were invited to take part. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: CopSoQ/Istas21 questionnaire developed for the multidimensional analysis of the psychosocial work environment. Stress symptoms were measured with the Stress Profile questionnaire.

resultsThe response rate was 67.5%. Compared with the Spanish workforce, our sample showed high cognitive, emotional, and sensory psychological demands, possibilities for development and sense of direction in their work. Primary care physicians were the group with a worse psychosocial work environment. All the groups studied showed high levels of stress symptoms. Multivariate analysis showed that variables associated with high levels of stress symptom were younger and with possibilities for social relations, role conflict, and higher emotional demands, and insecurity at work.

conclusionsOur findings support that the psychosocial work environment of health workers differs from that of the Spanish working population, being more unfavorable in general practitioners.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMedical Staff, HospitalNursing Staff, HospitalPrimary Health CarePublic HealthAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesStress, PsychologicalAtención primariaEstrésOccupational healthPrimary health careSalud laboralStress

Identifiers

PMID25443765
PMCPMC6983690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.