Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25443593›Full record

Trial reportJournal for specialists in pediatric nursing : JSPN2015

Effectiveness of a school-based academic asthma health education and counseling program on fostering acceptance of asthma in older school-age students with asthma.

Eileen K Kintner, Gwendolyn Cook, C Nathan Marti, Melissa Gomes, Linda Meeder, Laurie A Van Egeren

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing : JSPN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Asthma education for school staff.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eileen K KintnerThe University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, Austin, Texas, USA.
Gwendolyn Cook
C Nathan Marti
Melissa Gomes
Linda Meeder
Laurie A Van Egeren

Funding

Comparison of Asthma Programs for SchoolsR01NR010544 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI KINTNER, EILEEN KAE · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the academic asthma education and counseling Staying Healthy-Asthma Responsible and Prepared™ (SHARP) program on fostering psychosocial acceptance of asthma. DESIGN AND

methodsThis was a phase III, two-group, cluster-randomized, single-blinded, longitudinal study. Students from grades 4 and 5 (N = 205) with asthma and their caregivers completed surveys at pre-intervention and at 1-, 12-, and 24-months post-intervention. Analysis involved multilevel modeling.

resultsAll students demonstrated significant improvement in aspects of acceptance; students in SHARP demonstrated significant improvement in openness to sharing and connectedness with teachers over students in the control condition. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The SHARP program offers a well-tested, effective program for psychosocial acceptance of asthma, which is welcomed by schools.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationQuality ImprovementAge FactorsAsthmaChildCluster AnalysisCounselingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth EducationHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMultivariate AnalysisPatient Acceptance of Health CareSchool Health ServicesAdaptationadjustmentinterventionpediatricpsychologicalpsychosocialquality of liferandomized control trial

Identifiers

PMID25443593
PMCPMC4293268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.