Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25443110›Full record

ArticleNeuropathology and applied neurobiology2015

A neuronal DNA damage response is detected at the earliest stages of Alzheimer's neuropathology and correlates with cognitive impairment in the Medical Research Council's Cognitive Function and Ageing Study ageing brain cohort.

Julie E Simpson, Paul G Ince, Fiona E Matthews, Pamela J Shaw, Paul R Heath, Carol Brayne, Claire Garwood, Adrian Higginbottom, Stephen B Wharton, MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Neuropathology Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropathology and applied neurobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Ageing in the brain: mechanisms and rejuvenating strategies.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. DNA Double-Strand Breaks as Pathogenic Lesions in Neurological Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie E SimpsonSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Paul G InceSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Fiona E MatthewsMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Pamela J ShawSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Paul R HeathSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Carol BrayneInstitute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Claire GarwoodSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Adrian HigginbottomSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Stephen B WhartonSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Neuropathology Study Group
University of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400074Medical Research Council G0502157Medical Research Council G0900652Medical Research Council G1100540Medical Research Council G9901400Medical Research Council MC_U105292687Medical Research Council MR/J004 308/1Medical Research Council MR/J004308/1Medical Research Council MR/L016451/1Medical Research Council MR/L022656/1Medical Research Council U.1052.00.0013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPopulation-based studies have shown that approximately 20% of the ageing population (aged 65 years and over) with dementia have little or no classical Alzheimer-type neuropathology. Cumulative DNA damage and a reduced capacity of DNA repair may result in neuronal dysfunction and contribute to cognitive impairment independent of Alzheimer-type pathology in the ageing brain.

methodsWe investigated expression of the DNA damage response (DDR)-associated molecules γH2AX and DNA-PKcs using immunohistochemistry and western blotting, and senescence-associated β-galactosidase in the frontal association neocortex of cases with low levels of Alzheimer-type pathology (Braak & Braak stage 0-II), and explored their relationship to cognitive impairment in a population-representative sample from the Medical Research Council's Cognitive Function and Ageing Study cohort.

resultsIncreases in both γH2AX(+) (r(s)  = -0.36, P = 0.025) and DNA-PKcs(+) (r(s)  = -0.39, P = 0.01) neuronal counts were associated with a lower Mini-Mental State Examination score. Increasing levels of senescence associated-β-gal(+) pyramidal neurones were weakly associated with the total number of DNA-PKcs(+) neurones (P = 0.08), but not with traditional senescence-associated signalling molecules, including p53 and p16.

conclusionThe association between the neuronal DDR and cognitive impairment, independent of AD pathology in the ageing brain, may be suggestive of a causal link via neuronal dysfunction.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAlzheimer DiseaseBrainCohort StudiesFemaleHistonesHumansMaleNeuronsNeuropsychological TestsOxidative StressProtein KinasesPyramidal CellsHistonesProtein Kinasescognitive impairmentDNA damage responseDNA-PKcsneuroneγH2AX

Identifiers

PMID25443110
PMCPMC4861215
OpenAlexW1494866131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.