ReviewAcademic radiology2015
Clinical utility of quantitative imaging.
Review in Academic radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repeatability of an MRI protocol for generating habitats based on cellularity, perfusion, and hypoxia in a murine model of glioma.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2026Article
- Nationwide organ volume distributions and cross-sectional age-associated differences in abdominal CT from Japan.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- The Next Frontier in Quantitative Co-Clinical Imaging to Advance Functional Precision Oncology.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Inconsistencies in Clinical Reporting of Nasopharyngoscopy for Evaluating Velopharyngeal Closure: A Multisite Study.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
- Impact of Gaussian feathering on diagnostic metrics in tile-based micro-CT sinogram infilling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep-Learning-based Automatic Segmentation and Quantitative Measurement of Normal Spleen in Chinese AdultsCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Extending Regression Without Truth to Integrate Ground-Truth Measurements for Evaluating Quantitative Imaging Methods with Patient Data.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- Comparing evaluation of quantitative imaging methods using reference standards versus regression‑without‑truth‑based technique.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- The impact of pre-processing techniques on deep learning breast image segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Quantitative Prostate MRI, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025Review
- Three-dimensional high-isotropic-resolution MR fingerprinting optimized for 0.55 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Repeatability and Reproducibility of Pseudocontinuous Arterial Spin-Labeling-Measured Brain Perfusion in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Glioblastoma.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Ultrasound quantitative characterization of tendinopathy with shear wave elastography in an ex vivo porcine tendon model.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Contemporary clinical perspectives on chronic low back pain: The biology, mechanics, etc. underpinning clinical and radiological evaluation.JOR spine · 2025Article
- HDNLS: Hybrid Deep-Learning and Non-Linear Least Squares-Based Method for Fast Multi-Component T1ρ Mapping in the Knee Joint.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Microstructural Imaging of Bone and Joints.Current osteoporosis reports · 2024Review
- DTI-MR fingerprinting for rapid high-resolution whole-brain TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Need for Objective Task-Based Evaluation of Image Segmentation Algorithms for Quantitative PET: A Study with ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 Multicenter Clinical Trial Data.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024Article
- How accurately can quantitative imaging methods be ranked without ground truth: An upper bound on no-gold-standard evaluation.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024Article
- Smart capsule for monitoring inflammation profile throughout the gastrointestinal tract.Biosensors & bioelectronics: X · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative imaging (QI) is increasingly applied in modern radiology practice, assisting in the clinical assessment of many patients and providing a source of biomarkers for a spectrum of diseases. QI is commonly used to inform patient diagnosis or prognosis, determine the choice of therapy, or monitor therapy response. Because most radiologists will likely implement some QI tools to meet the patient care needs of their referring clinicians, it is important for all radiologists to become familiar with the strengths and limitations of QI. The Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance Quantitative Imaging Task Force has explored the clinical application of QI and summarizes its work in this review. We provide an overview of the clinical use of QI by discussing QI tools that are currently used in clinical practice, clinical applications of these tools, approaches to reporting of QI, and challenges to implementing QI. It is hoped that these insights will help radiologists recognize the tangible benefits of QI to their patients, their referring clinicians, and their own radiology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.