Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25442776›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)2014

Zero field splitting fluctuations induced phase relaxation of Gd3+ in frozen solutions at cryogenic temperatures.

A Raitsimring, A Dalaloyan, A Collauto, A Feintuch, T Meade, D Goldfarb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Decoherence of Hyperfine CoupledThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Extending the Range of Distances Accessible byJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Gadolinium Spin Decoherence Mechanisms at High Magnetic Fields.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. High-sensitivity GdMagnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A RaitsimringUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
A DalaloyanWeizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
A CollautoWeizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
A FeintuchWeizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
T MeadeNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
D GoldfarbWeizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. Electronic address: Daniella.goldfarb@weizmann.ac.il.

Funding

q-Modulated Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast AgentsR01EB005866 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MEADE, THOMAS J · 2005 to 2013
$2.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distance measurements using double electron-electron resonance (DEER) and Gd(3+) chelates for spin labels (GdSL) have been shown to be an attractive alternative to nitroxide spin labels at W-band (95GHz). The maximal distance that can be accessed by DEER measurements and the sensitivity of such measurements strongly depends on the phase relaxation of Gd(3+) chelates in frozen, glassy solutions. In this work, we explore the phase relaxation of Gd(3+)-DOTA as a representative of GdSL in temperature and concentration ranges typically used for W-band DEER measurements. We observed that in addition to the usual mechanisms of phase relaxation known for nitroxide based spin labels, GdSL are subjected to an additional phase relaxation mechanism that features an increase in the relaxation rate from the center to the periphery of the EPR spectrum. Since the EPR spectrum of GdSL is the sum of subspectra of the individual EPR transitions, we attribute this field dependence to transition dependent phase relaxation. Using simulations of the EPR spectra and its decomposition into the individual transition subspectra, we isolated the phase relaxation of each transition and found that its rate increases with |ms|. We suggest that this mechanism is due to transient zero field splitting (tZFS), where its magnitude and correlation time are scaled down and distributed as compared with similar situations in liquids. This tZFS induced phase relaxation mechanism becomes dominant (or at least significant) when all other well-known phase relaxation mechanisms, such as spectral diffusion caused by nuclear spin diffusion, instantaneous and electron spin spectral diffusion, are significantly suppressed by matrix deuteration and low concentration, and when the temperature is sufficiently low to disable spin lattice interaction as a source of phase relaxation.

Indexed as

FreezingModels, ChemicalComputer SimulationElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyGadoliniumKineticsNitrogen OxidesPhase TransitionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySolutionsGadoliniumNitrogen OxidesSolutionsGd3+Phase relaxationSpin labelsW-band EPRZero field splitting

Identifiers

PMID25442776
PMCPMC4495766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.