Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25442228›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2015

Receipt of diabetes preventive services differs by insurance status at visit.

Steffani R Bailey, Jean P O'Malley, Rachel Gold, John Heintzman, Miguel Marino, Jennifer E DeVoe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Validating ICD code case definitions for condition case ascertainment in multimorbidity measurement: a retrospective chart review.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steffani R BaileyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: bailstef@ohsu.edu.
Jean P O'MalleyDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Rachel GoldKaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon; OCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon.
John HeintzmanDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Miguel MarinoDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Jennifer E DeVoeDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; OCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Assessing a Medicaid Randomized Insurance Experiment within Community ClinicsR01HL107647 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVOE, JENNIFER E · 2011 to 2014
$2.8M
The Primary Care Medical Home and Preventive Service Use in Latino ImmigrantsK08HS021522 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HEINTZMAN, JOHN · 2013 to 2016
$590k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS021522AHRQ HHS K08HS021522NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL107647NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL107647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLack of insurance is associated with suboptimal receipt of diabetes preventive care. One known reason for this is an access barrier to obtaining healthcare visits; however, little is known about whether insurance status is associated with differential rates of receipt of diabetes care during visits. PURPOSE: To examine the association between health insurance and receipt of diabetes preventive care during an office visit.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study used electronic health record and Medicaid data from 38 Oregon community health centers. Logistic regression was used to test the association between insurance and receipt of four diabetes services during an office visit among patients who were continuously uninsured (n=1,117); continuously insured (n=1,466); and discontinuously insured (n=336) in 2006-2007. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for within-patient correlation. Data were analyzed in 2013.

resultsOverall, continuously uninsured patients had lower odds of receiving services at visits when due, compared to those who were continuously insured (AOR=0.73, 95% CI=0.66, 0.80). Among the discontinuously insured, being uninsured at a visit was associated with lower odds of receipt of services due at that visit (AOR=0.77, 95% CI=0.64, 0.92) than being insured at a visit.

conclusionsLack of insurance is associated with a lower probability of receiving recommended services that are due during a clinic visit. Thus, the association between being uninsured and receiving fewer preventive services may not be completely mediated by access to clinic visits.

Indexed as

Community Health CentersCohort StudiesDiabetes MellitusFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsurance CoverageMaleMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedOregonPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesSerum AlbuminGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanSerum Albumin

Identifiers

PMID25442228
PMCPMC4301980
OpenAlexW1969504173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.