ArticleClinical and translational science2015
Social network analysis to assess the impact of the CTSA on biomedical research grant collaboration.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Support of Underrepresented and Early-Stage Faculty at a Research Center for Minority Institutions: A Social Network Analysis of Research Productivity over a Five-Year Period.Innovative higher education · 2025Article
- Measuring the aggregated impact of research: Establishing criteria for coding Translational Science Benefits Model data.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Social network analysis of a decade-long collaborative innovation network between hospitals and the biomedical industry in China.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Collaboration and growth in a large research cooperative: A network analytic approach.Evaluation and program planning · 2024Article
- Bibliometric and social network analysis of a Clinical and Translational Resource awardee: An Oklahoma experience 2014-2021.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Evaluating the impact of a CTSA program from 2008 to 2021 through bibliometrics, social network analysis, and altmetrics.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Evolution of Social Networks: A Ten-Year Longitudinal Analysis of an Agricultural, Fishing and Forestry Occupational Health Research Center.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Evaluating the impact of a health hackathon on collaborative team science: a Social Network Analysis (SNA).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Bibliometrics approach to evaluating the research impact of CTSAs: A pilot study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Approaches to Measuring Trends in Interdisciplinary Research Publications at One Academic Medical Center.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2020Article
- Measuring team science: Associations between a clinical-translational science institute and investigator ego networks.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2019Article
- Network Abstractions of Prescription Patterns in a Medicaid Population.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019Article
- Charting the Publication and Citation Impact of the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program From 2006 Through 2016.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2018Article
- Network-based assessment of collaborative research in neuroscience.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2018Article
- Toward a science of translational science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017Article
- Effect of a Clinical and Translational Science Award institute on grant funding in a major research university.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017Article
- Scientific retreats with 'speed dating': networking to stimulate new interdisciplinary translational research collaborations and team science.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2017Article
- Improving clinical and translational research training: a qualitative evaluation of the Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute KL2-mentored research scholars program.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Success of the Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) program implicitly demands team science efforts and well-orchestrated collaboration across the translational silos (T1-T4). Networks have proven to be useful abstractions of research collaborations. Networks provide novel system-level insights and exhibit marked changes in response to external interventions, making them potential evaluation tools that complement more traditional approaches. This study is part of our ongoing efforts to assess the impact of the CTSA on Biomedical Research Grant Collaboration (BRGC). Collaborative research grants are a complex undertaking and an outcome of sustained interaction among researchers. In this report, BRGC networks representing collaborations among CTSA-affiliated investigators constructed from grants management system data at the University of Kentucky across a period of six years (2007-2012) corresponding to pre- and post-CTSA are investigated. Overlapping community structure detection algorithms, in conjunction with surrogate testing, revealed the presence of intricate research communities rejecting random graphs as generative mechanisms. The deviation from randomness was especially pronounced post-CTSA, reflecting an increasing trend in collaborations and team-science efforts potentially as a result of CTSA. Intercommunity cross talk was especially pronounced post-CTSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.