Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25440716›Full record

ReviewTrends in biochemical sciences2014

Ultrasensitivity part II: multisite phosphorylation, stoichiometric inhibitors, and positive feedback.

James E Ferrell, Sang Hoon Ha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in biochemical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Chromosome segregation synchrony inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Design principles of ciliary signaling.Journal of cell science · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Viruses and autophagy: bend, but don't break.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James E FerrellDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA 94305-5174, USA.
Sang Hoon HaDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA 94305-5174, USA.

Funding

TRAINING & OUTREACH COREP50GM107615 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI COVERT, MARKUS W · 2013 to 2017
$10.9M
THE ROLE OF MAP KINASE IN THE CELL CYCLER01GM046383 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI FERRELL, JAMES E. · 1991 to 2018
$7.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM046383NIGMS NIH HHS GM107615NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM107615NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this series of reviews, we are examining ultrasensitive responses, the switch-like input-output relationships that contribute to signal processing in a wide variety of signaling contexts. In the first part of this series, we explored one mechanism for generating ultrasensitivity, zero-order ultrasensitivity, where the saturation of two converting enzymes allows the output to switch from low to high over a tight range of input levels. In this second installment, we focus on three conceptually distinct mechanisms for ultrasensitivity: multisite phosphorylation, stoichiometric inhibitors, and positive feedback. We also examine several related mechanisms and concepts, including cooperativity, reciprocal regulation, coherent feed-forward regulation, and substrate competition, and provide several examples of signaling processes where these mechanisms are known or are suspected to be applicable.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalAnimalsBinding, CompetitiveBinding SitesEnzyme InhibitorsHumansKineticsPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesPhosphorylationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesEnzyme InhibitorsPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID25440716
PMCPMC4435807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.