Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25440307›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2014

Child- and family-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy for pediatric bipolar disorder: a randomized clinical trial.

Amy E West, Sally M Weinstein, Amy T Peters, Andrea C Katz, David B Henry, Rick A Cruz, Mani N Pavuluri

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Treatment moderators of child- and family-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy for pediatric bipolar disorder.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2015
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amy E WestUniversity of Illinois at Chicago. Electronic address: awest@psych.uic.edu.
Sally M WeinsteinUniversity of Illinois at Chicago.
Amy T PetersUniversity of Illinois at Chicago.
Andrea C KatzUniversity of Illinois at Chicago.
David B HenryUniversity of Illinois at Chicago; University of Alaska, Center for Alaska Native Health Research.
Rick A CruzUtah State University, but was with the University of Illinois at Chicago at the time the study was performed.
Mani N PavuluriUniversity of Illinois at Chicago.
University of Illinois Chicago · USNative Health · US

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000050 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI AZAR, DIMITRI T, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2012 to 2014
$9.8M
Psychosocial Treatment for Pediatric Bipolar DisorderK23MH079935 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WEST, AMY ELIZABETH · 2008 to 2012
$789k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000050NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000050NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH079935NIMH NIH HHS MH079935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrevious studies have found that family-based psychosocial treatments are effective adjuncts to pharmacotherapy among adults and adolescents with bipolar disorder (BD). The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of adjunctive child- and family-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (CFF-CBT) to psychotherapy as usual (control) for mood symptom severity and global functioning in children with BD.

methodSixty-nine youth, aged 7 to 13 years (mean = 9.19, SD = 1.61) with DSM-IV-TR bipolar I, II, or not otherwise specified (NOS) disorder were randomly assigned to CFF-CBT or control groups. Both treatments consisted of 12 weekly sessions followed by 6 monthly booster sessions delivered over a total of 9 months. Independent evaluators assessed participants at baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12 (posttreatment), and week 39 (6-month follow-up).

resultsParticipants in CFF-CBT attended more sessions, were less likely to drop out, and reported greater satisfaction with treatment than controls. CFF-CBT demonstrated efficacy compared to the control treatment in reducing parent-reported mania at posttreatment and depression symptoms at posttreatment and follow-up. Global functioning did not differ at posttreatment but was higher among CFF-CBT participants at follow-up.

conclusionCFF-CBT may be efficacious in reducing acute mood symptoms and improving long-term psychosocial functioning among children with BD.

Indexed as

AdolescentBipolar DisorderChildCognitive Behavioral TherapyCombined Modality TherapyFamily TherapyFemaleHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsPsychotropic DrugsSocial AdjustmentPsychotropic Drugscognitive-behavioral therapyfamily-focused interventionpediatric bipolar disorderrandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID25440307
PMCPMC4254579
OpenAlexW1978854331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.