Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25439688›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2014

Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.

Mila Donker, Geertjan van Tienhoven, Marieke E Straver, Philip Meijnen, Cornelis J H van de Velde, Robert E Mansel, Luigi Cataliotti, A Helen Westenberg, Jean H G Klinkenbijl, Lorenzo Orzalesi and 20 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 754 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
754citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
41.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00014612 phase3completednot on this map

After Mapping Of The Axilla: Radiotherapy Or Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCRan2001 to 2013Enrolled4,813ConditionsBreast CancerArmsaxillary lymph node dissection, lymphoscintigraphy, therapeutic conventional surgery, radiation therapy
NCT01717131 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Non Inferiority Randomized Multicenter Phase III Trial of Axillary Node Dissection Versus no Axillary Node Dissection in Case of Positive Sentinel Lymph Node in Invasive Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut Paoli-CalmettesRan2012 to 2031Enrolled2,228ConditionsInvasive Breast CancerArmsSurgery for standard axillary node dissection, No axillary lymph node dissection
NCT07683572 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Validation of Augmented-Reality/Virtual-Reality Goggle-Based Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Patients With Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorSs. Cyril and Methodius University of SkopjeRan2026 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsBreast Cancer, Breast Neoplasms, Sentinel Lymph Node, Lymphatic MetastasisArmsAR-ICG near-infrared fluorescence imaging
NCT07696754 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Mapping of Lymph Nodes Using Augmented-reality/Virtual-reality Goggles in Patients With Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSs. Cyril and Methodius University of SkopjeRan2026 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsBreast Cancer, Breast Neoplasms, Sentinel Lymph Node, Lymphatic MetastasisArmsAugmented-reality ICG fluorescence second-look imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

754 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,796 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer-regional nodal irradiation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. SEOM-GEICAM-SOLTI clinical guidelines for early-stage breast cancer (UPDATE 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. De-escalation of breast surgery for early stage breast cancer.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article

694 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 7 countries.

Mila DonkerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Geertjan van TienhovenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marieke E StraverDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Philip MeijnenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Cornelis J H van de VeldeDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Robert E ManselDepartment of Surgery, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Luigi CataliottiBreast Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
A Helen WestenbergInstitute for Radiation Oncology Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Jean H G KlinkenbijlDepartment of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands.
Lorenzo OrzalesiBreast Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Willem H BoumaDepartment of Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, Netherlands.
Huub C J van der MijleDepartment of Surgery, Nij Smellinghe Hospital, Drachten, Netherlands.
Grard A P NieuwenhuijzenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Sanne C VeltkampDepartment of Surgery, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, Netherlands.
Leen SlaetsEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Nicole J DuezEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Peter W de GraafDepartment of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, Netherlands.
Thijs van DalenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Andreas MarinelliDepartment of Surgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, Westeinde, Den Haag, Netherlands.
Herman RijnaDepartment of Surgery, Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, Netherlands.
Marko SnojDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nigel J BundredDepartment of Surgery, Manchester University Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Jos W S MerkusDepartment of Surgery, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, Netherlands.
Yazid BelkacemiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
Patrick PetignatDivision of Gynecology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Dominic A X SchinaglDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Corneel CoensEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Carlo G M MessinaEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Jan BogaertsEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Emiel J T RutgersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: e.rutgers@nki.nl.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITAcademic Medical Center · NLCardiff University · GBCatharina Ziekenhuis · NLCentre Oscar Lambret · FRGelre Hospitals · NLHaga Hospital · NLInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRadiotherapie Groep · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLSpaarne Gasthuis · NLUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Manchester · GBUtrecht University · NLZiekenhuis Amstelland · NL

Funding

EORTC HEADQUARTERSU10CA011488 · NCI · EUROPEAN ORG/RES/TREATMENT/CANCER · PI LACOMBE, DENIS · 1985 to 2015
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS 2U10 CA11488-28NCI NIH HHS 5U10 CA011488-38NCI NIH HHS U10 CA011488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIf treatment of the axilla is indicated in patients with breast cancer who have a positive sentinel node, axillary lymph node dissection is the present standard. Although axillary lymph node dissection provides excellent regional control, it is associated with harmful side-effects. We aimed to assess whether axillary radiotherapy provides comparable regional control with fewer side-effects.

methodsPatients with T1-2 primary breast cancer and no palpable lymphadenopathy were enrolled in the randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated allocation schedule to receive either axillary lymph node dissection or axillary radiotherapy in case of a positive sentinel node, stratified by institution. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of 5-year axillary recurrence, considered to be not more than 4% for the axillary radiotherapy group compared with an expected 2% in the axillary lymph node dissection group. Analyses were by intention to treat and per protocol. The AMAROS trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00014612.

findingsBetween Feb 19, 2001, and April 29, 2010, 4823 patients were enrolled at 34 centres from nine European countries, of whom 4806 were eligible for randomisation. 2402 patients were randomly assigned to receive axillary lymph node dissection and 2404 to receive axillary radiotherapy. Of the 1425 patients with a positive sentinel node, 744 had been randomly assigned to axillary lymph node dissection and 681 to axillary radiotherapy; these patients constituted the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up was 6·1 years (IQR 4·1-8·0) for the patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes. In the axillary lymph node dissection group, 220 (33%) of 672 patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection had additional positive nodes. Axillary recurrence occurred in four of 744 patients in the axillary lymph node dissection group and seven of 681 in the axillary radiotherapy group. 5-year axillary recurrence was 0·43% (95% CI 0·00-0·92) after axillary lymph node dissection versus 1·19% (0·31-2·08) after axillary radiotherapy. The planned non-inferiority test was underpowered because of the low number of events. The one-sided 95% CI for the underpowered non-inferiority test on the hazard ratio was 0·00-5·27, with a non-inferiority margin of 2. Lymphoedema in the ipsilateral arm was noted significantly more often after axillary lymph node dissection than after axillary radiotherapy at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years.

interpretationAxillary lymph node dissection and axillary radiotherapy after a positive sentinel node provide excellent and comparable axillary control for patients with T1-2 primary breast cancer and no palpable lymphadenopathy. Axillary radiotherapy results in significantly less morbidity.

fundingEORTC Charitable Trust.

Indexed as

AxillaBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalEuropeFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID25439688
PMCPMC4291166
OpenAlexW2133865595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.