Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25439160›Full record

ArticleAcademic pediatrics

Oral health opinions and practices of pediatricians: updated results from a national survey.

Rocio B Quinonez, Ashley M Kranz, Charlotte W Lewis, Lauren Barone, Suzanne Boulter, Karen G O'Connor, Martha Ann Keels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rocio B QuinonezDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Pediatrics, Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Electronic address: quinoner@dentistry.unc.edu.
Ashley M KranzDepartment of Dental Research, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Charlotte W LewisDivision of General Pediatrics, University of Washington and Craniofacial Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Wash.
Lauren BaroneDivision of Pediatric Practice, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Ill.
Suzanne BoulterDepartment of Pediatrics and Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH.
Karen G O'ConnorDepartment of Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Ill.
Martha Ann KeelsDivision of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Funding

Training Program for the Next Generation of Oral Health Researchers (NextGen)T90DE021986 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EVERETT, ERIC T. · 2011 to 2017
$2.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS 5T90DE021986-03NIDCR NIH HHS T90 DE021986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProfessional guidelines and state Medicaid policies encourage pediatricians to provide oral health screening, anticipatory guidance, and fluoride varnish application to young patients. Because oral health activities are becoming more common in medical offices, the objective of this study was to assess pediatricians' attitudes and practices related to oral health and examine changes since 2008.

methodsAs part of the 2012 Periodic Survey of Fellows, a random sample of 1638 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics was surveyed on their participation in oral health promotion activities. Univariate statistics were used to examine pediatricians' attitudes, practices, and barriers related to screening, risk assessment, counseling, and topical fluoride application among patients from birth to 3 years of age. Bivariate statistics were used to examine changes since 2008.

resultsAnalyses were limited to 402 pediatricians who provided preventive care (51% of all respondents). Most respondents supported providing oral health activities in medical offices, but fewer reported engaging in these activities with most patients. Significantly more respondents agreed they should apply fluoride varnish (2008, 19%; 2012, 41%), but only 7% report doing so with >75% of patients. Although significantly more respondents reported receiving oral health training, limited time, lack of training and billing remain barriers to delivering these services.

conclusionsPediatricians continue to have widespread support for, but less direct involvement with oral health activities in clinical practice. Existing methods of training should be examined to identify methods effective at increasing pediatricians' participation in oral health activities.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PromotionOral HealthPediatricsChild, PreschoolCounselingFemaleFluorides, TopicalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMass ScreeningPractice Patterns, Physicians'Risk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesFluorides, Topicaleducationfluorideoral healthpediatricianpracticeprevention

Identifiers

PMID25439160
PMCPMC4254652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.