Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25438814›Full record

ReviewCNS oncology2014

Molecular characteristics of pediatric high-grade gliomas.

Omar Chamdine, Amar Gajjar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A 4-Year-Old Girl With a Supratentorial Mass.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Successful treatment of aBMJ case reports · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Chromatin remodeling defects in pediatric brain tumors.Annals of translational medicine · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Omar ChamdineDepartment of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Amar Gajjar

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are extremely lethal tumors. Survival has not changed significantly in the past decades. The only known prognostic factors in pediatric HGGs (pHGGs) are extent of resection and histologic grade. Treatment has historically been based on adult trials because of the rarity of pHGGs and the lack of genomic tools to explore their unique molecular characteristics. The recent advances in molecular biological data helped divide these tumors into distinct subgroups. In this review, the authors focus on major molecular targets of alterations in pHGGs: histone H3.3, telomeres, PDGFRA, IDH, BRAF (V600E), ACVR1 and NTRK and briefly highlight the difference with the adult counterpart.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsChildGliomaHumansNeoplasm Gradingepigeneticshigh-grade gliomahistonemolecular biologypediatric

Identifiers

PMID25438814
PMCPMC4307752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.