Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25438792›Full record

ReviewPlant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology2014

Microbial signature-triggered plant defense responses and early signaling mechanisms.

Shujing Wu, Libo Shan, Ping He

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
20.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Jasmonic Acid Signals Involved inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. A Novel CFEM Effector inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. TheHorticulture research · 2024
    Article
  15. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shujing WuState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, National Research Center for Apple Engineering and Technology, Laboratory of Apple Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, College of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China.
Libo ShanDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, and Institute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Ping HeDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, and Institute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Electronic address: pinghe@tamu.edu.
Texas A&M University · USShandong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Differential regulation of plant innate immunityR01GM092893 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HE, PING · 2010 to 2022
$2.7M
Phosphorylation and ubiquitination of immune sensory complexes in innate immune signalingR01GM097247 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI SHAN, LIBO · 2011 to 2021
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092893NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been observed that microbial elicitors can trigger various cellular responses in plants. Microbial elicitors have recently been referred to as pathogen or microbe-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs or MAMPs) and remarkable progress has been made on research of their corresponding receptors, signaling mechanisms and critical involvement in disease resistance. Plants also generate endogenous signals due to the damage or wounds caused by microbes. These signals were originally called endogenous elicitors and subsequently renamed damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that serve as warning signals for infections. The cellular responses induced by PAMPs and DAMPs include medium alkalinization, ion fluxes across the membrane, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ethylene production. They collectively contribute to plant pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and play an important role in plant basal defense against a broad spectrum of microbial infections. In this review, we provide an update on multiple PTI responses and early signaling mechanisms and discuss its potential applications to improve crop disease resistance.

Indexed as

Plant ImmunityPlantsSignal TransductionDAMPs: damage-associated molecular patternsMicrobial elicitorsPAMPs/MAMPs: pathogen or microbe-associated molecular patternsPTI: plant pattern-triggered immunitySignal transduction

Identifiers

PMID25438792
PMCPMC4254448
OpenAlexW2047872855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.