Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25438148›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Automated stitching of microtubule centerlines across serial electron tomograms.

Britta Weber, Erin M Tranfield, Johanna L Höög, Daniel Baum, Claude Antony, Tony Hyman, Jean-Marc Verbavatz, Steffen Prohaska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Volume electron microscopy: analyzing the lung.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Flagellum couples cell shape to motility inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Britta WeberZuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Erin M TranfieldEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Johanna L HöögMax Planck Institute for Molecular Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany; Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Daniel BaumZuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Claude AntonyEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tony HymanMax Planck Institute for Molecular Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Jean-Marc VerbavatzMax Planck Institute for Molecular Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Steffen ProhaskaZuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics · DEZuse Institute Berlin · DEEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DE

Funding

WORKSHOPS AND TRAINING FOR IMAGE ANALYSIS USING IMODP41RR000592 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI BASS, PETER W. · 1985 to 2011
$11.9M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR000592NCRR NIH HHS P41-RR000592Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracing microtubule centerlines in serial section electron tomography requires microtubules to be stitched across sections, that is lines from different sections need to be aligned, endpoints need to be matched at section boundaries to establish a correspondence between neighboring sections, and corresponding lines need to be connected across multiple sections. We present computational methods for these tasks: 1) An initial alignment is computed using a distance compatibility graph. 2) A fine alignment is then computed with a probabilistic variant of the iterative closest points algorithm, which we extended to handle the orientation of lines by introducing a periodic random variable to the probabilistic formulation. 3) Endpoint correspondence is established by formulating a matching problem in terms of a Markov random field and computing the best matching with belief propagation. Belief propagation is not generally guaranteed to converge to a minimum. We show how convergence can be achieved, nonetheless, with minimal manual input. In addition to stitching microtubule centerlines, the correspondence is also applied to transform and merge the electron tomograms. We applied the proposed methods to samples from the mitotic spindle in C. elegans, the meiotic spindle in X. laevis, and sub-pellicular microtubule arrays in T. brucei. The methods were able to stitch microtubules across section boundaries in good agreement with experts' opinions for the spindle samples. Results, however, were not satisfactory for the microtubule arrays. For certain experiments, such as an analysis of the spindle, the proposed methods can replace manual expert tracing and thus enable the analysis of microtubules over long distances with reasonable manual effort.

Indexed as

Electron Microscope TomographyAlgorithmsAnimalsAutomationCaenorhabditis elegansElasticityImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicrotubulesOocytesSpindle ApparatusTrypanosoma brucei bruceiXenopus laevis

Identifiers

PMID25438148
PMCPMC4249889
OpenAlexW2150167921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.