Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25437724›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2014

Biological and behavioral risks for incident Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a prospective cohort.

Loris Y Hwang, Yifei Ma, Anna-Barbara Moscicki

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gender differences in risk taking behaviors forHealth care for women international · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Chlamydia related bacteria (Chlamydiales) in early pregnancy: community-based cohort study.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2017
    Article
  7. Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Loris Y HwangDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Yifei Ma
Anna-Barbara Moscicki
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

UCSF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024131 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$111.2M
Engaging University of California Stakeholders for Biorespository ResearchUL1TR000004 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2012 to 2015
$78.0M
Natural History of HPV Infection to NeoplasiaR37CA051323 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MOSCICKI, ANNA-BARBARA · 2005 to 2014
$15.4M
NATURAL HISTORY OF HPV IN TEENS--INFECTION TO NEOPLASIAR01CA051323 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI MOSCICKI, ANNA-BARBARA NONE · 1990 to 2004
$6.0M
Cervical Maturity, Mucosal Immunity, and Chlamydia trachomatis infectionK23AI076670 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HWANG, LORIS Y. · 2008 to 2012
$621k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000004NCI NIH HHS R01 CA051323NCI NIH HHS R37 CA051323NCI NIH HHS R37CA51323NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024131NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI076670NIAID NIH HHS K23AI076670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify biological and behavioral risks for incident Chlamydia trachomatis among a prospective cohort of young women followed frequently.

methodsOur cohort of 629 women from two outpatient sites was seen every 4 months (October 2000 through April 2012) for behavioral interviews and infection testing. C trachomatis was tested annually and any time patients reported symptoms or possible exposure using commercial nucleic acid amplification tests. Analyses excluded baseline prevalent C trachomatis infections. Risk factors for incident C trachomatis were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. Significant risks (P<.10) from bivariate models were entered in a multivariate model adjusted for four covariates chosen a priori (age, race or ethnicity, condom use, study site). Backward stepwise elimination produced a final parsimonious model retaining significant variables (P<.05) and the four adjustment variables.

resultsThe 629 women attended 9,594 total visits. Median follow-up time was 6.9 years (interquartile range 3.2-9.8), during which 97 (15%) women had incident C trachomatis. In the final multivariate model, incident C trachomatis was independently associated with human papillomavirus at the preceding visit (P<.01), smoking (P=.02), and weekly use of substances besides alcohol and marijuana (P<.01) since the prior visit. Among 207 women with available colpophotographs (1,742 visits), cervical ectopy was not a significant risk factor (P range=.16-.39 for ectopy as continuous and ordinal variables).

conclusionNovel risks for C trachomatis include preceding human papillomavirus, smoking, and substance use, which may reflect both biological and behavioral mechanisms of risk such as immune modulation, higher-risk sexual networks, or both. Improved understanding of the biological bases for C trachomatis risk would inform our strategies for C trachomatis control.

Indexed as

AdolescentCaliforniaChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMultivariate AnalysisProspective StudiesRisk FactorsRisk-TakingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25437724
PMCPMC4251549
OpenAlexW2082362007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.