Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25437531›Full record

ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2016

Efficacy of QuadroPulse rTMS for improving motor function after spinal cord injury: Three case studies.

Natalia Alexeeva, Blair Calancie

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05975606 (Exploring the Effect of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paired With Functional Electrical Stimulation to Improve Lower Extremity Function Following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05975606 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Exploring the Effect of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paired With Functional Electrical Stimulation to Improve Lower Extremity Function Following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorWestern University, CanadaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled14ConditionsIncomplete Spinal Cord InjuryArmsrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor ability, neurophysiological changes, mental health, and activities of daily living in spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalia Alexeeva
Blair Calancie

Funding

SPINAL MOTOR CONDUCTION AND RECOVERY AFTER HUMAN SCIR01NS036542 · NINDS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI CALANCIE, BLAIR · 1997 to 2009
$2.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01NS 36542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CONTEXT/

objectiveTo examine the effects of repetitive QuadroPulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS(QP)) on hand/leg function after spinal cord injury (SCI).

designInterventional proof-of-concept study.

settingUniversity laboratory.

participantsThree adult subjects with cervical SCI. Interventions Repeated trains of magnetic stimuli were applied to the motor cortical hand/leg area. Several exploratory single-day rTMS(QP) protocols were examined. Ultimately we settled on a protocol using three 5-day trials of (1) rTMS(QP) only; (2) exercise only (targeting hand or leg function); and (3) rTMS(QP) combined with exercise. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hand motor function was assessed by Purdue Pegboard and Complete Minnesota Dexterity tests. Walking function was based on treadmill walking and the Timed Up and Go test. Electromyographic recordings were used for neurophysiological testing of cortical (by single- and double-pulse TMS) and spinal (via tendon taps and electrical nerve stimulation) excitability.

resultsSingle-day rTMS(QP) application had no clear effect in the 2 subjects whose hand function was targeted, but improved walking speed in the person targeted for walking, accompanied by increased cortical excitability and reduced spinal excitability. All 3 subjects showed functional improvement following the 5-day rTMS(QP) intervention, an effect being even more pronounced after the five-day combined rTMS(QP) + exercise sessions. There were no rTMS(QP)-associated adverse effects.

conclusionOur findings suggest a functional benefit of motor cortical rTMS(QP) after SCI. The effect of rTMS(QP) appears to be augmented when stimulation is accompanied by targeted exercises, warranting expansion of this pilot study to a larger subject population.

Indexed as

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationWalkingAdultFemaleHandHand StrengthHumansLegMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalSpinal Cord InjuriesTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationTreatment OutcomeMotor functionRehabilitationRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID25437531
PMCPMC4725792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.