Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25437494›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Interface matters: the stiffness route to stability of a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase.

Maria Kalimeri, Eric Girard, Dominique Madern, Fabio Sterpone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biophysical and enzymatic comparison ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria KalimeriLaboratoire de Biochimie Théorique, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UPR9080, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Eric GirardUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Institut de Biologie Structurale, Grenoble, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Biologie Structurale, Grenoble, France; Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux énergies alternatives, Institut de Biologie Structurale, Grenoble, France.
Dominique MadernUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Institut de Biologie Structurale, Grenoble, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Biologie Structurale, Grenoble, France; Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux énergies alternatives, Institut de Biologie Structurale, Grenoble, France.
Fabio SterponeLaboratoire de Biochimie Théorique, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UPR9080, Univ. Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRInstitut de Biologie Physico-Chimique · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work we investigate by computational means the behavior of two orthologous bacterial proteins, a mesophilic and a thermophilic tetrameric malate dehydrogenase (MalDH), at different temperatures. Namely, we quantify how protein mechanical rigidity at different length- and time-scales correlates to protein thermophilicity as commonly believed. In particular by using a clustering analysis strategy to explore the conformational space of the folded proteins, we show that at ambient conditions and at the molecular length-scale the thermophilic variant is indeed more rigid that the mesophilic one. This rigidification is the result of more efficient inter-domain interactions, the strength of which is further quantified via ad hoc free energy calculations. When considered isolated, the thermophilic domain is indeed more flexible than the respective mesophilic one. Upon oligomerization, the induced stiffening of the thermophilic protein propagates from the interface to the active site where the loop, controlling the access to the catalytic pocket, anchors down via an extended network of ion-pairs. On the contrary in the mesophilic tetramer the loop is highly mobile. Simulations at high temperature, could not re-activate the mobility of the loop in the thermophile. This finding opens questions on the similarities of the binding processes for these two homologues at their optimal working temperature and suggests for the thermophilic variant a possible cooperative role of cofactor/substrate.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCatalytic DomainChlorobiumChloroflexusCluster AnalysisCrystallography, X-RayEnzyme StabilityMalate DehydrogenaseModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein MultimerizationThermodynamicsBacterial ProteinsMalate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID25437494
PMCPMC4250060
OpenAlexW2043970776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.